True speed?

[lasbazrre]

Hi i'm new here, i pick up my 182ff with cup pack's next week

What is the true 0-60 time's of the above, ive read 6.49, to 7.4 ! which is closer?

What's the offical 0-60 that Renault give ?

Do they make the speed? , or do they go faster than the speed given?

I'm not a boy racer , i'm 35

Just want to know

Thanks

leon

 

[n2x]

i've seen 6.6-7.2 but i guess it doesn't really matter. Its helluva fast anyway

 

[Christopher]

autocar and evo have both figured the full fat 182 at 6.6

so i go with that.

 

[Russ_16v]

just say high 6s its easier that way

 

[Tony Hunter]

Hi i'm new here, i pick up my 182ff with cup pack's next week

What is the true 0-60 time's of the above, ive read 6.49, to 7.4 ! which is closer?

What's the offical 0-60 that Renault give ?

Do they make the speed? , or do they go faster than the speed given?

I'm not a boy racer , i'm 35

Just want to know

Thanks

leon

Hi there,its quick enough,but yes high 6's and Im 48

 

[ja.jack]

I managed a 5.9 sec dash to 60, and I'm 55.

 

[Tony Hunter]

Seems the older you get the faster they go.Glad we've got an age thing going .ps you were'nt going down hill were you

 

[ja.jack]

Sorry, meant to say 6.9. But had a small person on board with stopwatch.

 

[philmots]

Thiink the reno book figure was 7.1, 7.0 for the 182 cup? 6.9 for the 172 cup

I just say about 7 seconds.

 

[Hawk]

Autocar actually posted 6.3 to 60 and 17.0 to 100mph, they are the best figures ive seen!

 

[trile]

i didn't want to open another thread, so i'll ask here

if renault says 197 does 0-62 in 6.9s... what's the REAL time?
7.1 ...7.2 ?

worst?

 

[Munson]

My Gtech recorded 6.41 to 60 some months ago. Since then CAT has fallen apart again so I might retry for a 6.3*

 

[Munson]

i didn't want to open another thread, so i'll ask here

if renault says 197 does 0-62 in 6.9s... what's the REAL time?
7.1 ...7.2 ?

worst?

The 197 I drove felt circa 8.

 

[kully]

on average around the 6.5 mark is a good bet

 

[Munson]

on average around the 6.5 mark is a good bet

For the 197? Not on your nelly my friend. More like 7.5 IMO

 

[Munson]

s**t sorry, I think I'm losing the plot.

Yes, 6.5 would be about right for a 182

 

[kully]

s**t sorry, I think I'm losing the plot.

Yes, 6.5 would be about right for a 182

hehe .....rodney

 

[trile]

i didn't want to open another thread, so i'll ask here

if renault says 197 does 0-62 in 6.9s... what's the REAL time?
7.1 ...7.2 ?

worst?

The 197 I drove felt circa 8.

with how many miles on the clock?
you know it's not the same thing when it has 600 miles and 6.000 miles

i'm hoping for 7.2 ...maybe :S

 

[Munson]

The 197 I drove felt circa 8.

with how many miles on the clock?
you know it's not the same thing when it has 600 miles and 6.000 miles

i'm hoping for 7.2 ...maybe :S

It felt slower than my 182 with 6 miles on the clock.

 

[Russ_16v]

My Gtech recorded 6.41 to 60 some months ago. Since then CAT has fallen apart again so I might retry for a 6.3*

i managed 6.51 with my gtec, i best go out and have another try

 

[Steve2004]

My Gtech recorded 6.41 to 60 some months ago. Since then CAT has fallen apart again so I might retry for a 6.3*

i managed 6.51 with my gtec, i best go out and have another try

Managed 6.28 on mine (only did two runs, 6.4 was the other). Was done on the flat. Would have done more but I feel my rattly old Renault will break if I did. :dapprove:

I don't know how accurate these G-Tech things actually are, but any figures which say 0-60 is 7 secs+ are wrong imo.

 

[Munson]

Only 172Cup and 182Cup are 6 second cars, the chav wagons are ar all 7+ (IMO)

 

[lasbazrre]

LoL , what's a chav wagon, 182 FF? , and with cup pack?

thanks

leon