And a much better soundtrack too :approve:.Dash said:Quicker than my Austin 1100 was. I'm happy.
FPMSL ... your eloquence reaches new heights :approve:.lagerlout1 said:The male ejaculation leaves the penis with the same velocity as a bullet from an Enfield .303 rifle... but that doesn't mean I'd want to drive round town in a lump of jism. ;-)
So who was driving in this instance Simon?SimonV6 said:0 - 60 = 5.87
0 - 100 = 14.67
60 - 100 = 8.80
Quarter Mile = 14.21
Terminal Speed @ 98.41
16vturbolee said:no comp for the turbo these v6
16vturbolee said:no comp for the turbo these v6
KarlosFandango said:And just think, you could have bought something nice for what that lot cost
16vturbolee said:you prob wouldnt keep it in stright line
16vturbolee said:trust me if i wanted one that bad i would have one but if i was to bye a new one it would a 182 not a v6 as their just as quick
SimonV6 said:We ain't talking about turbo'd clio's thuogh are we.....my old Renualt 5 GTT was faster than my V6, bacause it had been highly modded to give it 230bhp per tonne.....still prefer my Vee though and we can always mod if we wish too
std for std for comparisons please.....
Simon
Martin. said:V6 is cracking car I think it's bit of a shame it was'nt given circa 300 bhp to back up it's pumped up looks...
Anyone apart from MikeT done any serious tuning?
SimonV6 said:std 182 is slower than V6 255 to 60, 100 and top speed, there is NO comparison.......
Simon
Dutch 172 said:cups are faster
Martin. said:V6 is cracking car I think it's bit of a shame it was'nt given circa 300 bhp to back up it's pumped up looks...
Anyone apart from MikeT done any serious tuning?
Dutch 172 said:cups are faster