ClioSport.net
Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.
182
hmm un driveable 350bhp car?? mapping a turbo car is a art!and turbo cars chav? have u seen how many chavs own N/A cars? with v-tec yo.? i think you will find all the FASTEST cars are turbos. id rather have alittle lag with a turbo then never ending lag with N/A lol.
there is nothing wrong with N/A. it justs cost alot of money to not go that fast.but yes a high reving car sounds nice.
350bhp turbo in FWD is not going to drive as nice as my ITB'd Clio. I'll peel all my skin off and roll around in salt if it's anywhere near as usable lol.
horses for courses, I like high revving N/A power and in a car as light as a Clio ITB's are enough to see of most things and more importantly, have loads of fun in
Anyway, going back on topic, Foxon's car will also be up there with the quickest NA's, as will Lucky's... thinking about it GDI have done a s**t load more ITB'd engines that the owners of dont even come on here. I know of one ITB'd engine producing whopping power that would spank any and every car mentioned so far... but in the world of Clio Sport Martin's old time is the one to beat... only problem there is getting it down to equal weight to level the playing field... not happening, so only answer is more power lol
yes thats fair anuff mate.i like high reving n/a cars also.
8k rpm.. turbo civic lol? joke....
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=FdijTTxWwWk
what against that civic or for the quickest NA title?
tbh, it's all funding dependent, but I suppose all it takes is one of the tuners to just go all out and build a total beast. Andy's if he puts that on bodies would be the quickest so far though, and easily imo as it rapes mine on single body... no mean feat when I shift gear at twice the speed due to his clutch and fucked gearbox lol
Common denominators are always a clue.
You can get about 350hp out of the F4R but its not cheap even with out boost.
I think I remember of hearing of a 270hp N/A Clio 2.0 tunned not sure exact spec but from what I remember was expensive race engine so could have had a special box so would possible be the quickest if setup for it.
182
i wonder if anyone has one of these?
http://www.supercars.net/garages/CitroenSM/33v2.html
http://www.supercars.net/garages/CitroenSM/33v2.html
hmm un driveable 350bhp car?? mapping a turbo car is a art!
there is nothing wrong with N/A. it justs cost alot of money to not go that fast.but yes a high reving car sounds nice.
Oh really??
Mclaren F1, fastest road production car for many years was NA.
Martin_172
ClioSport Club Member
hmm un driveable 350bhp car?? mapping a turbo car is a art!
there is nothing wrong with N/A. it justs cost alot of money to not go that fast.but yes a high reving car sounds nice.
Oh really??
Mclaren F1, fastest road production car for many years was NA.
owned..... lol!!
hmm un driveable 350bhp car?? mapping a turbo car is a art!
there is nothing wrong with N/A. it justs cost alot of money to not go that fast.but yes a high reving car sounds nice.
Oh really??
Mclaren F1, fastest road production car for many years was NA.
and how much was that again??!
P
phill172
what about the GDI one? it was at the french car show, they said they were running about 230bhp through a single throttle body still??
yup that's correct, over 230bhp on single body... I have a vid of mine against it but I wont be posting it up here lol.
When you fitting your turbo then?
Yozzas stripped out cup is the fastest surely. Lightest weight of any of the other mk2 ITB'd cars on cliosport. The AWT mk1 is very lightweight and stripped so maybe thats quicker.
JRs Vee :clown: shame hes too old to go fast in it. Also what do they weigh? About 1400kg.
300/1.4 = 214bhp/ton not exactly a stripped out lightweight is it.
mines down to about 850kgs now + the cage (30kgs) so 880kgs
hoping for 250 n/a
so power to weight would be.....
Power at Flywheel (BHP) : 250
Weight without Driver (KG) : 880
Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) : 288.65
0 - 60 (Secs) : 4.62
0 - 100 (Secs) : 10.946
0 - 100 (Secs) : 6.31
Quarter Mile (Secs) : 12.97
Terminal Speed (MPH) : 108.90
Drag Strip Quarter Mile (Secs) : 12.77
Drag Strip Terminal Speed (MPH) : 110.94
hoping for 250 n/a
so power to weight would be.....
Power at Flywheel (BHP) : 250
Weight without Driver (KG) : 880
Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) : 288.65
0 - 60 (Secs) : 4.62
0 - 100 (Secs) : 10.946
0 - 100 (Secs) : 6.31
Quarter Mile (Secs) : 12.97
Terminal Speed (MPH) : 108.90
Drag Strip Quarter Mile (Secs) : 12.77
Drag Strip Terminal Speed (MPH) : 110.94
It sure is too fast for little old me. This car makes me light headed at high speeds lol
Oh and the engine cover alone weighs about 1400kg
What cams are you going for?
throw in MR en two ow
= 350hp
Power at Flywheel (BHP) : 350
Weight without Driver (KG) : 880
Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) : 404.11
0 - 60 (Secs) : 4.17
0 - 100 (Secs) : 9.186
0 - 100 (Secs) : 5.02
Quarter Mile (Secs) : 12.42
Terminal Speed (MPH) : 116.28
Drag Strip Quarter Mile (Secs) : 12.22
Drag Strip Terminal Speed (MPH) : 118.45
= 350hp
Power at Flywheel (BHP) : 350
Weight without Driver (KG) : 880
Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) : 404.11
0 - 60 (Secs) : 4.17
0 - 100 (Secs) : 9.186
0 - 100 (Secs) : 5.02
Quarter Mile (Secs) : 12.42
Terminal Speed (MPH) : 116.28
Drag Strip Quarter Mile (Secs) : 12.22
Drag Strip Terminal Speed (MPH) : 118.45
Find out the code for them, it will give you an excuse to check on progress
.Depending on cams I would say more like 240bhp. Is he doing the power run at Mass? Thats worth another 20bhp at least.
I think its an age thing. Ask JR, it amazes me how he manages to post anything on that computer he uses
mine will be on bodies fairly soon i hope, with cams etc that foxon is using, so im hoping for around 230bhp and mines down to around 820kg, i havent started drilling interior panels yet...
Christopher
ClioSport Club Member
Z4M
LAD remap and TBR dashboard...
Tom
ClioSport Club Member
EV (s)
No chance, we wont sell to any lad customers.
Christopher
ClioSport Club Member
Z4M
ah, fair play. don't blame you tbh
Jenvey 45mm throttle bodies
emerald or omex ecu(havent decided yet. It will also be mapped by stan or ben.)
awt ported head
skimmed head
pico injectors
ARP rod bolts, may even extend that to arp head studs,
lightened flywheel.
Find out the code for them, it will give you an excuse to check on progress
Depending on cams I would say more like 240bhp. Is he doing the power run at Mass? Thats worth another 20bhp at least.
check the part numbers, as Ben fooled me into thinking the cams were his 'own design and profile' and were just off the shelf jobs from CAT.
have you had it RR'd before it went off to Ben so you have something to measure against, as you wont be able to tell if they are reading high or low or spot on... I recommend RE Performance in Bury, not the best setup I've seen, but the results seem in line with what you would realistically expect and are consistent.
I think its an age thing. Ask JR, it amazes me how he manages to post anything on that computer he uses
Mark, you're no spring chicken yourself I hear, and whats this about you taking a handbag/satchel everywhere you go? someone told me you were straight? :quiet:
Find out the code for them, it will give you an excuse to check on progress
Depending on cams I would say more like 240bhp. Is he doing the power run at Mass? Thats worth another 20bhp at least.
check the part numbers, as Ben fooled me into thinking the cams were his 'own design and profile' and were just off the shelf jobs from CAT.
have you had it RR'd before it went off to Ben so you have something to measure against, as you wont be able to tell if they are reading high or low or spot on... I recommend RE Performance in Bury, not the best setup I've seen, but the results seem in line with what you would realistically expect and are consistent.
I think its an age thing. Ask JR, it amazes me how he manages to post anything on that computer he uses
Mark, you're no spring chicken yourself I hear, and whats this about you taking a handbag/satchel everywhere you go? someone told me you were straight? :quiet:
yer the engine sucked mens c***s.
had it done at system R and minispeed
one was 163 hp and the other was 167....
was a poor poor engine. it had had a cambelt snap at one point too. pistons were goofed :/
Not sure what cams i'll be going for, depends whats on the market when im nearing completion...
