I went from a 172 (MK2) -> CTR -> 172 (MK1)Quote: Originally posted by zippyy on 06 April 2005
anybody here changed from ctr to 182. if so what do you think of the change? any regrets?
I did it the other way round... Clio 172 Cup to CTR...Quote: Originally posted by zippyy on 06 April 2005
anybody here changed from ctr to 182. if so what do you think of the change? any regrets?
dont really drive long distance. maybe 3 or 4 times a yearQuote: Originally posted by miketheman2k on 06 April 2005
Nope, but I drove both and the 182 is a more natural drive. Do you drive many miles?
Nice and refreshing to hear a balanced viewpointQuote: Originally posted by Rich-D on 06 April 2005
I did it the other way round... Clio 172 Cup to CTR...Quote: Originally posted by zippyy on 06 April 2005
anybody here changed from ctr to 182. if so what do you think of the change? any regrets?
The Civic is built better, larger/more spacious car, more refined, amazing engine & box, better driving position, better dealers, faster top end, etc...
However the Clio is more fun, better steering feel, more nimble, wider power band, higher spec (in 182 trim), better value, etc...
Each has its pros & cons and I dont regret owning either!