Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
phase 1. cos it looks better and i didnt have enuff money for a phase 2. but i do think front looks better on ph1 and prefer the nice colourful seat stitching.
same car tho innit really. ph1 rarer too.
Ph1 for driving and throwing around or Ph2 with all its toys and better dash.
Ph1's stand out more, most think they are ugly. I have kept his car longer than any other so it must be good. Although I will be selling it after French Car Show this year.:dapprove: .
I think this question has been asked a few times lol, its all down to personal opinion. I would test drive both if I were you. On the plus side the ph1's are cheaper for the same performance. There are quite a few good ones out there as well.
Phase 2 looks just like every other Clio in its rage where as you know when theres a phase one coming towards you as it has a totally different front end.
Rare too. Sure i read somewhere that Renualt only officially imported 1300 phase 1's in to this country via main dealers.
Hard choice! My sis has the 1.2 phase 2 lol so slow but is a good car. Clio 172 much different obviously. I know this is going to be pretty bias but around a tack or whatever which one do you think will be the quickest?
phase 1s are lighter than phase 2s by 100kg???? thoutgh that was just diff between ff and cup?
u learn something new every day. well i dunno about diff between ph1 and ph2 cos i only owned phase 1, but i think its, overall, best car ive ever owned so far at 27 even if it appears to have lost me my licence