What's new
By:
ClioSport.net

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.

Suprising RR Result...

Stu_350z

Stu_350z

Car  350z GT
Ok so just had the Cup on a set of rollers near me, owned by a guy who builds race engines...

Result is 177.4 bhp :eek:

was only expecting 160ish at best

Heres the graph, ignore the massive torgue spike on the last run, slipped on the rollers...

WP_0004982.webp


A standard Focus ST was put on the rollers afterwards and made 223.1 so Rollers are accurate...

Cup is standard apart from a ITG Panel filter....as far as i know :/
 
Mine made 183.6bhp on rollers - standard car (I only had it a month at the time!) lol
 
A guy called Smart Performance....he builds race engines for Minis mainly but will do runs if you ask him

and thats why we ran the ST after as i was a little sceptical but as that made what it should...

im fairly pleased :)
 
Does seem a little smooth lol

But should this affect the end figure??

And why would it read accurate for the ST and not mine??
 
The tyres slipped i meant...the car itself was rock steady....

There was no snaking side to side at all and was strapped down in 5 places

Also that was only the last run it did that....even on the one before it registered 176.3
 
they're properly optimistic, probably the most lol

Mine made on a hot day 210 on one run and 212 on another. anywhere else it's made between 200 and 205
 
somewhere like TDF who has a rolling road AND an engine dyno could be regarded as pretty accurate, anyway, who cares

if its fast its fast

Naith's 172 made "less than 150bhp" and out ran me the other day!
 
Agree....

Only did it so i have a starting point ready for the mods that are planned...that way i can roughly know how much each mod has added :)

still love the way the car drives, whether it had said 160 or 180 :)
 
Fred@BTM said:
but on a decent dyno martin, not a tonka toy dastek ;)
Click to expand...

lol i didnt make 191 however i did make 173 as standard on falklands rollers when all other standard 172s were doing the usual 165 ish and 182s doing 170 odd.

same story a year later with inlets, 182 manifold, decat, stealth and itg, 188bhp 15hp gain seems about right for that lot, went from 145lbft to 160lbft too!
 
Andyman said:
Not as good as the ph1 with fancy orange bits in this months French car mag. He got 220 bhp from a remap, IK and Powerflow ''apparently'' LOL
Click to expand...

I read that this month and did have a little chuckle to myself as that's the deal of the century, all these guys spending there cash on ITB's and low pressure turbos only end up with 210bhp-240bhp and they are spending a good couple of grand more lol think it's been on some very friendly rollers, although still looked a nice car
 
If your wheels were slipping on the rollers the figure is even more out from the close guestimate that a rr would give you in the first place.
 
Adeyspec said:
If your wheels were slipping on the rollers the figure is even more out from the close guestimate that a rr would give you in the first place.
Click to expand...

Slipped once dude...you can see the spike in the graph...

was planted the rest of the run :)
 
PFC mag? didn't they do something similar in the old days with their 197 after a superchip remap? said it was 220bhp LOL
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
New Clio 200 EDC member
Replies
27
Views
15K
James
James
mart.z.s
Mart.'s 172 Cup
2
Replies
58
Views
14K
mossyv6
mossyv6
C
Megane
Replies
29
Views
3K
Crybert
Crybert
steviekyle13793
My 172 Cup Track Car Project
2
Replies
41
Views
10K
steviekyle13793
steviekyle13793
TimR26
11th Annual Surrey Rolling Road Day (Photos and Results)
Replies
36
Views
7K
CalJ21
CalJ21
Back
Top