Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Nah, its not as good as it was on the older cars, but there is a lot more low down grunt in comparison.
With a couple of basic mods (i.e. zorst & filter) youll get more of a kick though! :cool:
Err... see my previous post...
They are chalk & cheese, nowt like each other to drive and its very hard to choose between them, as one is better in some areas, the other better in different areas. Both great cars but I aint regretted selling the Clio!
Yeah, got your text but it wont let me reply?! :confused:
Met up with Ben (VTEC Abuser) on Friday, and also saw you run against Nick once, but I never found you for some reason...
Anyway, was too hot and I thought my times were sh!t, but after watching what everyone else got over the 3...
Nothing against you personally Yoz, it was just your name that was brought up by someone else, so I just used the figures I had, which just happened to be yours... :oops:
So when have I been saying stuff about your car in the past?! In the past I have been defending it on the CTR forum, as I...
True...
Its how it performs that matters, Ive just been using the RR to see how the mods have improved power & torque, but I also use the 1/4 mile times as a comparison.
Will be at Pod this weekend! ;)
Heres your problem...
225bhp @ fly = 162bhp @ wheels (with a 28% loss)
To get 225bhp @ fly from 176bhp @ wheels is actually a 21.8% loss, not a 28% loss as you think you are getting my multiplying by 1.28
Now nearer 20% is much more believable!
So all my engines were good?!
If I use your loss value...
306 Rallye: 151bhp @ wheels = 210bhp @ fly (with just a panel filter)
Clio Cup: 147bhp @ wheels = 204bhp @ fly (with just a Viper)
CTR: 176bhp @ wheels = 244bhp @ fly (with just zorst & filter)
However, I believe it may be...
Maths aint your strong point obviously...
You do NOT multiply by 1.28 as you are not working with a 100% value in this case. The 176bhp @ wheels is 72% (100% - 28%) of the @ fly figure, which is the 100% value.
Thus:
(176bhp / 72%) x 100% = 244bhp @ fly
Work back 244bhp, remove 28%...
Cant be much... my Cup had 147bhp @ wheels with just a Viper at 5k miles, standard 172s make low/mid 140s @ wheels and my old 306 Rallye had 151bhp @ wheels with just a panel filter!
Goes against everything else Ive seen/read/experienced then...
So if my CTR has a 28% transmission loss and I have 176bhp @ wheels, then that means Id have 244bhp @ fly, which is a staggering 47bhp increase from a cat-back exhaust and induction kit!
Im sorry, but that is blatently not the case!
Also has a a zorst and grounding kit too... but basic, simple mods.
Standard CTRs "should" make about 160(ish) at wheels in standard form, some more, some less.
In a straightline race, the GTi-6 will lose in standard fom, but on the twisty stuff the 306 is very good...
A 306 Rallye is pretty much on a par with a mk2 172 in terms of performance.