Search results

edde! u are a star! dont suppose u know what it is for my sax vts too? 0.35 is real low! thought it was higher than that!

tucks, i think theyre kerb weighs mate. seem too low. plus a willy cant weigh less than a valver - but i guess thats max power for ya!

right i need (for setting up my ap22 meter for everyone to use on the airfields meet) the mass (total weight of car + driver + half tank fuel) cda - aerodynamic figure for the car rolling resistance of all clios V6 mk1 172 182 1.6 16v 1.4 16v 1.2 16v williams 16v rsi rts...

higher the bite point the worse its worn in general isnt it?

Quote: Originally posted by Winston on 03 February 2005 Thats a Beast!!!!!! Im hopeing to dip into 14s as well :D Theres quite few going for the title of fastest this year. ull all be chasin mr read. his will be hittin 13s im pretty definate on that!

sainsburys superunleaded is bp ultimate too. itll be fine

are we talking the same car or 2 different cars?

Quote: Originally posted by Adamf on 01 February 2005 oh and the pedals suck!!! yea totally agree! man its hard to get used to drivin without pressin em all at once!

thing is theyre exactly the same cars vts and gti so wat difference would it make?

Quote: Originally posted by blaze on 31 January 2005 You obviously have issues as a Saxo driver. Who realy cares anyway. Could/not be fast. Again who cares. Lets just hope you are not scrapped up off the road like so many before you.This is afterall a Clio forum. Likening a modified car to...

Quote: Originally posted by Bryan on 31 January 2005 blaze - in bens defence he drives a supercharged vts, which is quick, not sure if it could get to the limiter in 5th though, would be interesting to see it can easily with the vts box in at the mo. no idea on the vtr box. but ratios and...

Quote: Originally posted by blaze on 31 January 2005 Ben J got me on that one. I only had a Carrera GT3. Too less on the points.Ben J one must assume you are a very young man. 185 out of that car is physically impossible. The engine cant rev that far. Nor can any VTR gearbox. GROW UP.Just...

so were all agreed vtrs are chav but vtss are far better than 182s ;) sorted :devilish: lol

its ok dont worry, clarkie is just a stalker

Quote: Originally posted by blink172 on 31 January 2005 241.1mph in a 9ff tuned 911, beating the Mac F1 by .1Ill take that card, thanks very much damn you!

Quote: Originally posted by clarkiev6 on 31 January 2005 Quote: Originally posted by cliolass on 31 January 2005what airfield is this? think it may be too far for me, be great if you can get me a price <FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #407db6">Cheers at honiton on the 13 feb.... or are...

they teach u to put big w**k spoilers on. drive around with 14 yr old girls in your car and rave music up as loud as possible with distorting speakers you bought from woolworths

Quote: Originally posted by blaze on 31 January 2005 Whats all this off the line sh!te. No performance is based purely on this nonsense. Of course 4*4 will get off the line quicker. My God has been said tOOOOOO many times.When rolling the 4*4 will suffer against a F/RWD, given the same power to...

Quote: Originally posted by sargeantinio on 31 January 2005well i had a saxo vtr a few years ago and ok its not to touch a vts so keep ya pants on but the handling was sh*t and i mean sh*t my 182 handles tonnes better and as for youre 200 bhp saxo fair play it might be fast but thought we were...

Quote: Originally posted by jph172 on 30 January 2005165mph from 120bhp-thats the biggest load of crap ive heard in ages!!! definatley dreaming there.:cry: u havnt been reading have u? na rob. my point is. i dont need to defend the vts over a 172/182. i have one that would paste...

williams vs 172

clio vs metro 6r4

u mean real carbon fibre. or stick on stuff?

Quote: Originally posted by Frosty on 30 January 2005 Is it really "Evo eating" though? I mean come on - it might have the same power as the Evo, but I cant see it running 11 seconds to 100mph through its front wheels! no but i expect side by side from second gear itll pull away slowly

totally agree caz. its a lot better build quality, lots more extras, safer etc. the extra power really means itll pull away at high speeds... but round a track... ud be very surprised!

well ud need a clio boss kit unless it luckily already fits in place. and ud need a steering wheel puller too to get ya old one off

Quote: Originally posted by JEZZA182 on 30 January 2005 I cant beleive what Im Seeing - the 182, 172 and both cups will destroy the saxo in any form, VTS or VTR. In a straight line goodbye saxo, in the twistys goodbye saxo, in the high street looking good stakes... goodbye saxo!! any form...

Quote: Originally posted by sargeantinio on 30 January 2005well ben j is a penoid ive said it before and ill say it again there is no substitute for cubic capacity Quote: Originally posted by RobHardyUK on 30 January 2005165mph with 120bhp right firstly penoid think u should do some reasearch...

hoe, wat would u say handles better?

Quote: Originally posted by stevoversteer on 29 January 2005 Quote: Originally posted by Ben j on 29 January 2005nope theyre aint much in em at all. its all down to gearing too dont forget. a valver and 172 will hit 150 ish top end revs a vts will only hit 130 top end revs. so has quicker...