clio turbo vs pusar gtir

[mudflap boy]

Quote: Originally posted by Tom16v on 31 January 2005

Quote: Originally posted by George16v on 31 January 2005

Trouble is that they look W*NK in my opinion

in my opinion that is the whole point of pulsars. look stupid and to everyone who knows nothing they look lame, but can kick a fair few cars asses. plus when someone asks you what car you have and you say a nissan sunny they laugh until you hoon it away from them in the 2.0 turbo 4x4

[Edited by mudflap boy on 31 January 2005 at 9:15pm]

 

[Ads_172]

I have one question, in response to pigmes repeated posts at the beginning....



Whats a Pusar?

 

[Ben j]

Quote: Originally posted by Bryan on 31 January 2005
blaze - in bens defence he drives a supercharged vts, which is quick, not sure if it could get to the limiter in 5th though, would be interesting to see


it can easily with the vts box in at the mo. no idea on the vtr box. but ratios and wheels size etc means if it has the power to push it there it is capable of 167 @ 7400 revs

 

[Ben j]

Quote: Originally posted by blaze on 31 January 2005
You obviously have issues as a Saxo driver. Who realy cares anyway. Could/not be fast. Again who cares. Lets just hope you are not scrapped up off the road like so many before you.This is afterall a Clio forum. Likening a modified car to standard, and then again saying well "IT CAN BE MODIFIED MORE"


it is fast.. and im not biased as a saxo driver. i own a modded 16v which will easily give most 172s a good run and has done many a times. i love my clio. but fun factor wise the sax is far better! most 172/182 drivers are just too high strung to acknowledge it