Search results

Popo just hatin' on manz k-tec stealf

How have I missed this, Dave you joker! Actually quite like it, great banter at the same time!

As above, I let my Mum have my car over Christmas when we had the snow as her Merc was going nowhere! Shes a good driver and would never rag it.

Re: Project OEM Chavbox. Alot of Pictures Stop bangin on about it, move on. Looks lovely that...Always thought the MK1 looks more aggressive than the MK2! VTR/S in standard form or tastefully modified are good looking cars.

Some of this is a bit O.T.T for me and I like a spot of detailing! How much quicker are they than the normal Puma? I know asking that question kinda misses the point but do forgive me :)

Also seen this car in Coleshill!

Clearly a man of taste!

Thats tidy mate! Tbf most 1.2 Clios are owned by 17/18 year olds now so stereotyping is inevitable, but thats smartly modified so it has some credibility.

Also, sometimes a search brings up archived posts from the old forum and you see a few established members talking in a manner that would now see one labelled a chav! So I don't think theres been any great change really. Hot hatches attract enthusiasts, but they also are loved by chavs. Not...

People on cliosport don't realise how good they've got it lol! You should see ZSOC...good club, but even some of the the admin/mod's on there are seriously dumb! You would despair at some of the conversation on there, Munson. Thats another 'fun little car' as you put it, that has suffered from...

Looks stunning Luke! Pictures are amazing as always too.

Stunning!! Great pictures make all the difference too.

Mines cuts out a handful of times, my mates VTR does it too.

Don't worry about a slightly lumpy idle...they all do it now and then. As long as it's not going right up the revs and down again it isn't anything to worry about so I've been told!

Ok. If you really see a light hearted, innocuous remark as provocation then you evidently have issues.

Your views contrast with pretty much everyone elses in the thread and don't make much sense. Then you offered idiotic comments like "you'd look like a tw*t in a 205". Thanks, but no thanks for your opinion. PMSL at the last bit! Have you taken that personally? What would your reaction be if...

Lol I know, I was quoting Romeo Dunn from the last page. Just highlighting one of many daft comments.

"yeh but u look like a tw*t in a 205 nowadays", need I say anymore tbh.

Find where I have given you an opinion on either car? I have asked sensible questions and corrected you on some daft, misinformed comments.

You need correcting, you're not making sense. I think you need to get an understanding for the meanings of "physically" and "raw" I'll let someone else correct you from here, was a decent thread until your ramblings!

Looks nice mate I'm sure you'll have it up to your standards before long. Bit of a wheelbarrow look going from the rear at the moment lol! Yozza time for that exhaust!

That's physical. WTF have you been smoking tonight to prompt a string of daft comments?

Not physically as raw? In what way is it raw then? Mentally raw? Lol

Same rawness as an '80's hot hatch? I highly doubt it! I'll let someone who has driven one come along and confirm it then. I've admitted I haven't driven either, that doesn't mean I can't engage in the discussion. I don't need to have driven either to inform you that you're quite clearly...

The discussion is mainly about the drive, got nothing to do what you look like in either.

Does a cup not handle totally differently from a 205? i.e. more geared towards understeer than oversteer? Tell me, I'm keen to know, I'm yet to drive either.

Wow Einstein, steady on or else you might conquer the world!

Was suprised by the useful input by 2 live. True say, the 309 is often regarded the discerning choice. Didn't take long before the W word came into action though !

Re: Roy's Shed - Esploding in Anthracite Looks suspiciously clean for an ardent anti-detailer.

Unlucky!