Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
gr, most of us blokes know all about womens problems - you have to remember, you dont have a monopoly lol !!... its us that suffer, not you..
hee hee... ooooops, Jayne just slapped me !:devilish:
gr, most of us blokes know all about womens problems - you have to remember, you dont have a monopoly lol !!... its us that suffer, not you..
hee hee... ooooops, Jayne just slapped me !:devilish:
A reasonable court would agree that full attention and due care can not garantee no accidents.
HKCM, thats an interesting point.. however, the IAM Roadcraft manual is based on the premise of the system of car control
if you drive to the system, you will never have an accident that is your...
A reasonable court would agree that full attention and due care can not garantee no accidents.
HKCM, thats an interesting point.. however, the IAM Roadcraft manual is based on the premise of the system of car control
if you drive to the system, you will never have an accident that is your...
math is not my strong point lol..
however, if the total distance is 2 miles (2 laps of 1 mile each) we need a total time of 120 seconds for the 2 laps (2 mins) to average 60 mph (1 mile in 60 secs)
as the first lap has taken 2 mins... we cant do it.. all our alloted time has been used...
math is not my strong point lol..
however, if the total distance is 2 miles (2 laps of 1 mile each) we need a total time of 120 seconds for the 2 laps (2 mins) to average 60 mph (1 mile in 60 secs)
as the first lap has taken 2 mins... we cant do it.. all our alloted time has been used...
hmmmmmmm.. yep, understood..
we will have to exchange briefcases at Euston after tripping over a discarded ice cream cone.... yep. that would do..
I must admit, the revelation of the light speed theory is appealing Eddd M8..
aint considered that angle.. but hey....
if a piece of kit...
James, my friend, most sorry, but that info is not published (whee I can find it...)
I keep meaning to take a side of the front sus to bits n measure rates / free length etc.. ust need time to do it lol..
Joe.
again, sorry, I cant help on this one.
hmmmmmmm.. yep, understood..
we will have to exchange briefcases at Euston after tripping over a discarded ice cream cone.... yep. that would do..
I must admit, the revelation of the light speed theory is appealing Eddd M8..
aint considered that angle.. but hey....
if a piece of kit...
Great handle.. good quantity of tea contained......
apart from that... there is virtually NO torque steer with a 172, I cant see why a cup should be different.. ?
r u sure u aint confusing power / traction to road surface with torque steer ??.. torque steer is mechanically induced...