Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
100 on public roads??!! Off with your head!
ST's are poo - have to agree! I can't believe this topic has been discussed so hard! If you had just shared your poo comment at the start, it would have ended right there.
Ahhh...someone who has some sense!
Although, I wasn't blown away by the 350Z. Didn't feel as quick as I thought it might be, very smooth and sorted though.
For 27.5K, there are plenty of better options than a 2.5 ugly looking, half-a$$ sports car. I've never read a good review about one so I don't have any intentions of experiencing one. Acceleration doesn't loose peoples' licences, people do. 6.7ish to 60 might adequate for most, but for that cash...
There is nothing about the ST that is better than the Clio. Pace, handling, interior, exterior.etc. They look okay (when they haven't been striped-up!) but they are not in the same league as the Clio. Okay, they are both hatchbacks.
Reminds me of a guy that delivers around here with a VTR. He once had about 8 massive pipes coming out the back, I'm sure it made Top Gear. Complete loser!
I got black diamonds and they have been fine so far, much better than stock. I also got Feredo DS2500 pads and Goodrich braided lines. Big improvement! Under £400 fitted. Mosty people on here recommend Brembo discs but I thought I'd try something else.
You don't?
Not sure why anyone would inform their insurance that someone hit them? The other person's insurance should take care of everything. No honesty required.
The V-Power etc is better and probably worth the money. May or may not give you a bit more performance, better MPG and should look after your engine a bit better.
I always use V-Power. It may cost a bit more I can live with that.