Search results

Agreed.;)

Girl racer!! :cool:

0-60 doesnt bother me either. Would be far more interested on 30-70, 70-100 etc, but I dont have a gadget to measures those!!

CB1N... I think...

6.56 best (spurious - next lowest was 6.71!!), average 6.8 over about 7 or 8 runs. Doesnt seem a million miles out if standard is 7.1 to 62 mph. Mk2 172 btw, with half a tank, set of golf clubs, bag, magazines, football kit, clothes trainers etc all in boot. Not bad considering. lol. Could...

No it isnt . The car itself is 3mm lower. Either way, its still too f**king high.

Cool as f**k.:cool: You need to get the sides smoothed or something though... but then again I guess thats just adding un-necessary weight...

What the f**k was the 172 driver doing in first gear?? sh*t load of wheel spin or aomething revs up, revs down, revs right up than a piss poor change into second. And the gearing in the mk1 172 makes it slower in the midrange. Even though, it should have murdered a 325 imho.

;)

Hes only jealous because he cant afford a new car. Ignore him. If he polished his rusty old bucket, thered be f**k all left of it.

Any more pics....:oops:

From all the things that go wrong with them, from my time on here I can noly recall a handful of actual engine problems. Mostly niggly electrical problems, but very few mechanical failures in comparison.

Jeeeesus!! How much did that little lot set you back??!!

Jeeeesus!! How much did that little lot set you back??!!

lol.... Pointless you getting one Roy. If your still on your first set of PE2s you obviously drive like a gay and couldnt get under 10 seconds to 60.

And thats all. But for £25, who cares??!! I just wish there were more perfectly flat roads near me. Used an ever-so slight downhill and got a 5.8, which is nearly a second quicker than the best on the flat. lol. BUT if you use the same peice of road and the same settings, it could be a handy...

PMSL. Dreamer.

Best of 6.56. Averaged 6.82. Fat Slow 172. Seems a little bit... erm...dodgy. Difficult to set perfectly and very easy to manipulate the readings. But good fun. And the first time Ive ever atttempted standing starts. I think I could smeel my clutch burning. lol.

It sounds nice. Mine seems to pull abit better up top, but I seem to have a few flat spots low down. Need a remap really.

As above. 80 mph is a horrible speed to cruise at in the RSs ( Mk1 not so bad, but at the price of acceleration). A dull drone.... Annoying on a long haul.

:o:o:o:o talented guy you are Roy!!! ... but orignal rubber after 13k gives you -100 man points. 8,000 on my 172.... And loony still called me gay for that. Must try harder!!!;)

:D

Dunno, but Id geuss the lower half of you right leg and most of your left arm.

Probably closer to 4krpm imho....

f**king Horrible!!!! Sorry!!

:o:o:o:o:o "For perceived quality (the impression you get when you open the doors and touch or look at the fit and finish of the interior) the Clio is as good as small cars come. Its at least the equal of the VW Polo....."

imho... no. A lot of hassle involved ( 7hrs work - engine out, or subframe off, modifications to exhaust) BUT you will get good gains. Apparently, and this is from the guys that know, the 182 manifold is an excellent design. [Edited by lagerlout1 on 09 September 2005 at 8:23pm]

Dude, its two wires. And I managed to stretch my washer hose, but its probably easier to put a new bit in. I had some slack on mine in the roof lining so didnt have to.. Take out the Fuse for lights (look in book) Remove existing spoiler an disconnect brake light and washer nozzle ( retain...

Get a 182. Its a better car. imho.