Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
One thing after another with this car. So close now though to having it done. It's going to feel like a rocket. The cam pics are very strange. the lobe is completely untouched. Been very lucky I feel. The damage could have been a lot worse.
Bad news: My 172 is with Yozzasport at the moment for some tinkering. The initial rolling road was very disappointing showing a peak of 134bhp. Now that the engineers have got in to the engine they've discovered that one of the cam followers has broken off, before the car was ever sold, and I...
...wasn't meant to sound like dissing someone's car, just surprised at the figures. Poor journalism too, not finding out why that result could have occurred. Was it something to do with different cam profiles Andy?
£3k+ for less torque than Andy's non TB'd car - that's why the TB comment was made. Surprised me that's all. No explanation given in the article which would have been useful. Not like GDI doesn't know what was done to the car.
Interesting article none the less. Should have been Performance Clio...