Search results

:sick:

Welcome to the Club anyway mate, hope you find a good one:)

Some of those prices are crazy. The first one is £30k:o And one of them mentions an 8 month wait? I waited 2 weeks from a Renault dealer. And got 2k knocked off without any hassle. Knobbers.:cry:

I didnt even know the 255 was made in 2002? I thought the first ones arrived mid 2003. Mines No.9* and its a 2004. Could be wrong:oops:

Shocking:@

Thats just in your opinion mate. In my opinion and the opinion of the test drivers of Evo magazine the V6 far outclasses the VX.:)

Id still go for the V6.:D There are better, and cheaper vans out there than the Civic TypeR. The Vauxhall Combi is better and also the old Fiesta Couriers. And for £17k you could get a pretty decent Transit.

Same colour as mine.:D Still pretty low numbers, good to see.

Welcome mate. Another V6 owner. Roughly, what number is yours:)

Thats your opinion mate, and your quite entitled to it. Free speech and all that. I admit, if you look at the basics £27k is a lot for "A Clio". But its a Clio in the loosest sense of the word. However the V6 did blow the VX220 Turbo, R32, Z4, 350Z, RX8 and a few others out of the water in...

Take a Civic out for a drive, then take a V6 out for a drive. A decision will be made Im sure.:D

LOL, Ill remember that next time the wife twists my ear about lack of shopping space. Dumb bint.

Mk1 172 1.5 DCI Mk2 V6 And theyve all been great cars:D

25 Y/O, Mk2 V6, £710 Fully Comp with Admiral.

And I ripped into a magazine editor as well, just for good measure. Oh and I think somebody got there ClioSport account deleted as well. And all because of a few lies and crossed wires. HEHE.

Thanks for that Guy. Ill e-mail you with info, Ill volunteer my V6 for the photo shoot.

The mention of legal action does wake things up. Got a phone call from the magazines Editor, Guy Baker. Hes explained the whole thing, very polite chap. Basically said V6 2004 (Or what ever your called) has no links to the mag, so all what he said about reporting to the Editor was Bollox. So...

Whoever that V6 2004 guy is, he clearly hasnt discovered life outside of the internet, sad c#nt. Id love to meet him and introduce a 32" shifting spanner to his head. JUST TO CLARIFY: I KNEW NOTHING ABOUT THAT sh*tE MAG, NOR ITS sh*tE ARTICLE. IT WASNT ME, OR MY CAR. IF I HAD THE TIME ON MY...

Ill e-mail the guy and ask him why hes printing my quotes of here in a national magazine, using my name, my words. And raising hell on here.:@

No mate, as I said the first time I knew anything about that article, even that magazine was on Saturday in WHSmith when I was flicking through the mag. The car wasnt mine, the photo wasnt me. A section of that quote was me, and they used me name. Nobbers.:@

Thought Id try to defend myself about that article. I am the Simon Bailey in that article, however the photo is not of me, and the car is not mine. And I cant remember which childish tw#t said I locked my keys in, but thats bollox as well. I typed those few lines for somebody on this forum...

Welcome Russ:)

Chillllllll Winston. Id be going but Im working, many miles away.:(

My old 172 used to get 41mpg travelling to work.:D The v6 cant do better than about 32 so far.

They obviously never had grandparents who had to build a certain railway then.:cry:

Ive had 80 out mine:o

As Mary Poppins once said "It depends on your point of view". I wanted a powerfull, rear wheel drive, fun car that handled well and went well and would do a few runs to Le-mans. I have two other cars so its lack of storage really doesnt matter. I drove all the Jap stuff, 350Z, Evos blah...

Yes I quite like the Mk2 V6.:p

Mines a MK2, and its less than 100, but for security reasons Im not willing to pin point that number.

Cat 1 all the way. And youve got Tracker fitted as standard.:)