Search results

Re: Cambelt Con/Rip off tactics. Not of your own doing, however, gullible? Yes.

Re: Cambelt Con/Rip off tactics.

Re: Cambelt Con/Rip off tactics. But usually lots of bent valves I expect?

Re: Cambelt Con/Rip off tactics. He makes a mint in selling tartan paint and skirting board ladders to help pay for his repair on broken cambelt claims iirc

Re: Cambelt Con/Rip off tactics. This places IQ is dropping by the day. We'll soon be naming it Speshialsport.net and the area meets will be at the local ELC shop to use their stock of crayons.

Re: Cambelt Con/Rip off tactics. It's so you can get away with saying you have a diesel for road tax iirc

Re: Cambelt Con/Rip off tactics. I was just thinking that myself. Either that or an individual who needs an appropriate adult to accompany him.

Re: Cambelt Con/Rip off tactics. Flol. Do tell me how a poorly maintained car will have an effect on cambelt life. Because a well maintained one would have had the cambelf changed on time.

Re: Cambelt Con/Rip off tactics. 7 Years and 46,000 miles. Still believe they don't deteriorate?

Re: Cambelt Con/Rip off tactics. I mean, I guess those rubber tyres that start cracking when old must not be made of rubber. As it wouldn't deteriorate. Nor would those rubber bushes that deteriorate with time. Or those rubber brake hoses. Or easiest of all, wiped blades never go hard and stop...

Re: Cambelt Con/Rip off tactics. Lol ok then. Let us know how that goes.

Just over the water in Somerset. I've got a few customers who are on my customer base who are from South Wales one as far as Pembrokeshire.

The VVT doesn't activate at 5k anyway. It sounds like it needs a proper diagnostic session. I'm fairly local to South Wales if you need a specialist.

105nm.

Exhaust paste is hideous stuff.

Really necessary to drive like you were on the starting grid? Swerving out from your lane to make it past 1 car? I do advise you set £60 aside however, as the way you were driving I doubt you saw the Speed camera can sat in the layby just by that junction.

They've done research and found the braking distances to be pretty similar. Brakes may be better nowadays, however cars weights have gone up considerably. The damage isn't far enough away from the junction for him to have braked at the junction. The glass will have fallen off further away from...

MWM is the most local decent mapper that I'm aware of.

Leaky injector seals?

But as I'd previously stated, if he pulled out just behind another car heading the opposite direction, the drivers view of the junction would have been obscured.

4-5 car lengths is less than the stopping distance from 30mph. You do the math ;)

I thought this, but the position of the glass says otherwise.

Bumpers naturally pop out in a crash.

I only viewed the pictures on my phone. Now having looked on a PC I'm also of the opinion there is too little damage.

Monday isn't an issue, I've got a few things in but I'm sure I can accommodate :)

I'm sorry, but I disagree. You may think you'd stop by then, and if you we're doing tests, you potentially would stop just after, but that's with you knowing your have to brake. The other driver could've had his mind elsewhere at the time, fatigue, auto pilot etc. 2 car lengths is rougky where...

I'm sure I can deal with that. Drop me a text if you have my number?

Ed, could you re-PM me what you wrote, I've just remembered you pm'd and I've had a clear out :(

Bolts.

I've only just seen the pictures. At a guess the glass is 45ft from the junction. Say you pulled out and you were doing 10mph avg before the impact. That is 14.66ft/sec. So you were in the road for 3 seconds before the impact. Stopping distance from 30mph is 75 feet. So say you pulled...