Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
there's a tech update from renault about valve heads. Seen a few fall off, but IMO it's from over-revving and bouncing off the limiter.
spoke to a guy from a works rally team that uses the F4 and he said they've had several failures due to heads falling off
it's pretty easy. Still always sensible to go to someone that knows the car. Water pumps are prone to leaking, and tensioners are wrongly fitted and adjusted on a lot that i see
probably gonna cost you more to engineer something. Remember the inlet cam has an oil feed bolt also. so without a VVT sprocket there's a fair few bits to work out. Get a VVT pulley IMO
due to manufacturing tollerence, the only way to know is to plasticine check really
you could (although non VVT inlet cam would be better) but TBH, you're better off keeping VVT and mapping in the right switch points. There's definite benefits to it
LOl, if you say so. I like a car to be able to pull away below 4k. Telling people throttle bodied cars are all flat and crap low down cos you dont know how to do it right is just s**t
well using the one you use was worst ;) made fair gains with other maps but still not full potential that i've seen (using standalone) and know can be done
no good re-flash maps available for anything though. I've seen much better performance from cams and standalone. Every re-map on stock ECU has been disappointing. Got my own opinions on why that is. Never had access to stock ECU editing thogh for the clio though so not been able to prove it yet.
sensible. Pop over to JMS one day when i'm there and you can have a look at my mk1 RSI. Omex with full clubman loom fitted. Standalone is the only way to travel