Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I have more fun in my cup with approximately 50% less hp than my Astra! Lol! Driving experience is just so much better and that's where it's at for me now. Roll on May the 1st so I can get it taxed and back on the road again. You can only be a hooligan so much in a works transit connect van!!
My opinion of that is one is a cup drilling and the other is ff. Somewhere along the way during manufacture of replacement parts, someone's got it round their sack and just fired them together not knowing there's a difference between the cup or ff.
All my opinion of course, but it's the only...
It depends on if you want camber I suppose! Lol! The o/s does look strange though with how far the hub sticks out. I'd be tempted to take a die grinder to the o/s and elongate the hole 2mm, or return them to where you got them and see if they have any others in stock so you can compare them all...
This sounds very much to me like one is cup and one is ff tbh mate. 2mm should be enough to bring the camber on a cup back to that of a standard car. I'd imagine it's the top bolt hole of the 2 that has been located differently.
From memory cups and ff's have the same camber angle from the...
Yes mate I'm on about 172 cup dampers so if yours is 54mm spacing they'll fit. There's no way that Renault could get a ff172 and a cup to have the same camber without camber correction to compensate for the additional 5 or so mm additional track width per wheel that the cup has.
Are both...
I still maintain that cup dampers have different drillings to compensate for the slightly wider front track so this could be a part of your problem maybe? Especially if you've got more negative camber (wheel in more at the top)
It's more biased to making power sooner tbh, but obviously that will alter the torque spread too. I'll let you know how peaky the engine is when mines in and running! Lol
Look here in this post and you'll see what they look like: http://www.cliosport.net/forum/showthread.php?729447-On-the-hunt-for-a-clio-r3-exhaust-manifold
Yeah they're a proper bit of kit ain't they! They're about 1k from Renault as well, so not excessive imo. Lol - hammer and a condom mate! If the hammer don't work, f**k it! Flol
You'd need to check the combustion chamber for clearance on a 1*2 if using 197 pistons, but other than that yeah pretty much fit and forget.
The maxi kit is something that was offered as an upgrade package for the Clio R3 rally car. There were 2 different packages available - R3 maxi (230hp)...
It's worth mentioning that you need to drill and tap the 197 head to accept a 1*2 idler roller as well. The 197 cambelt runs the water pump so it doesn't require the idler that the 1*2 has.
In a perfect world yes as they are intruder type pistons from the factory.
No RS2 won't match up at all as the bolt pattern is different and on the 197/200 head the ports are higher up. I modified a 172 head to accept a 197 inlet, but it's far too much hassle and work to be worthwhile doing.
It's mainly seats with the wrap around head restraints and quick release steering wheels that they've clamped down on. I never had an issue with my x door bars at all.
Yeah it's standard as well other than the exhaust. They're like a fine wine, get better with age! Lol! Yeah Stephens a nice honest genuine bloke mate. He's maintained it regardless of cost as well.