Search results

100% confirmed? http://www.apecbraking.co.uk/compare?compare%5B%5D%5B657344%5D=DSK+2552 ^wrong size

i can't stand them! horrible cars

indeed you should have!

leave that exhaust alone! its perfect

Re: Bomber's Savage Supercharged Snorting Slut of a Ph1 did a phs1 cambelt today and it had the same dodgy crank! W plater

and the girliest looking one!

its worth £500 as it is (yes that is the going rate for a 172 with knackered cambelt) Revels - dude i'm not deleting 500pm's just so i can pm you! LOL

they're all specific, trust me!

the cups have 4 outlets off the MC the 2 rear lines run to the bias valve above the rear axle on the passenger side, check that isn't knackered first!

stick to a 50 IMO, all our track clios run a 50 just for added saftey there's no perfomance benefit between a 40 or 50 i can put you in contact with the guy who looks after all of the engines for Renaultsport if you want

mater clyinder comes out through the pedal box ie, from indise the car, not that hard

tesco super is circa E5 bioethanol, don't get het up about RON rating, as i say the trade off you have is you use more fuel, so you are pissing in the wind slightly as the cost will work out the same

^this was going back about 3 years, 20L was 5 laps of the hungaroring, stung my eyes when that thing fired up! from memory we were doing 1min 25's Vs's F1 at 1min 19's but we were +50kg, not much aero and no TC, i miss that car!

Re: 1.2 Track car Conversion i'll get in the car right now and drive to Warrington just to slap you if you do! don't mess with perfection, i designed them NOT to fit into the bumper

^still have to map it to suit, plus (in simple terms) you have to use approx 30% more E85 than petrol to get the same power (its way more complicated than that, but i'll keep it simple)

we ran E100 on a judd 4.0 V10, epic stuff, but the car used 4L per lap Vs F1 at 3.2L per lap LOL, we had to refuel LOTS!!

i see more failed coolant temp sensors than i do thermostats, but if the thermostat is fucked it will probably knacker the sensor as a result - in simple terms change both if these break then the ecu thinks the engine is on cold start and dumps loads of fuel in = knackered MPG

21.9mm i think it is off the top of my head

105nm ALWAYS torque them, "just do them up tight" is a stupid idea (sorry, but its a saftey issue!)

1144's are NOT a track pad, fooking dangerous things!

yeah that or 10W40 if yo're being cheap

full lock and measure the distance between the 2 lower shock bolts (centre to centre) 60mm = cup

^for a 1.2 ;)

they're £50 for a pair of discs, hardly breaking the bank and don't get too hung up on Brembo discs, its a lump of cast iron at the end of the day! you should really use DS2500's (or any fancy pad) with fresh discs, but its not gospel but ask yourself this - as (i assume) a novice track...

no chance are they doing the aux kit for that price

Re: 1.2 Track car Conversion a lardy arse 850kg mk2 ;)

ah 1 - bumper bolts/undertray J - holds the loom onto the upper gearbox 3 legged bracket looking at that photo 2 - not from a renault E - is for holding the loom onto the inlet, just by fuel rail i think

when i can be bothered i'll write it out A - 16mm nut, underside of the front lower box mount B - pad carrier to hub, 18mm C - Lower box mount to gearbox (16mm) D - driveshaft bolts x 3 (13mm) E - earth strap "i think" (16mm) F - slam pannel 13mm G - possible airbox, depends on length...

^no just under the head, don't stick any down the hole

^not on the thread, just under the head of the bolt