ClioSport.net

Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.

1.2 16v Clio Vs 1.1 saxo who will win





just woundered my mate put the same question on a saxo site, but those engin r sh*t slow 0 -60 in 16 aint it. dave
 
  Polo + Micra


i think you might have the edge but his will be a lot lighter

(pmsl at odd subs)
 


Clio, will win definetly, 1.1 saxos are pretty slow.

Ive driven both, and the c2 with same engine. They are very underpowered.:D
 


Quote: Originally posted by Matt Williams 2 on 08 March 2005


Who cares????

:p
only doing it cos my mate put it on his saxo forum and they all said it would saxo would win lol i have raced my mate sh*t slow
 
  Fiat Coupe 20v turbo


Jaunty angled zorst, lexus lights what more do you need to take a saxo to the next level of sh*tness!? lol Id say the clio would be slightly less sh*t slow compared to the lovely saxo.
 
  LY 200


1.1 Saxos are sh*te subs, Lexus lights or not fact is it really wouldnt matter!!!

I would hope a 1.2 16v Clio would have been considerably nippier that my K plated mk1 1.2 RL and i had no probs sitting with a mates 1.1 Forte on many occasions!!! (and my 1.2 was SLOW ;))
 
  Remapped derv Golf


1.2 16v Clio should be almost as quick as a 1.4 Saxo Furio or West Coast (75bhp too but they are alot lighter though)

1.1s are only 60bhp.

You should have the edge.

remember when a young lad in a Saxo 1.0 Scandal tired to race my VTR. LOL!

Cant believe knowones spotted the racing seats LMAO!
 


Top