The 100dci was overpriced IMOo vs a 172/182.adtmits said:I am currently driving my mates DCi100.
Is nice and punchy, has a poor gearbox though and I feel like I am always changing gear. It is comfortable on the motorway though. It returen 50mpg with easy.
The only issue I have with it is the spec. considering the cost it has nothing (excepet rear discs) over a 1.2!!! As a second hand buy these are resonable though.
edde said:The 100dci was overpriced IMOo vs a 172/182.
Thats why they loose a load of value from new.
The Fabia VRS or ibiva TDi with a 6 speed better spec and 30hp more was about the same price plus they have a more sporty spec list.
That was a little bit extra when new.adtmits said:Aye, he paid 8k for his 10months old. 100 miles on the clock, but list was summit like 12k. I really wound have expected elec. sunroof and AC as minium for that kind of price.
Depends how you drive maybe 1~2mpg more than the figures I've quoted in my 65 due to longer gearing.tick said:so what kinda mpg could i expect on the 80 dci?
Brock said:Hey!
I got a 65bhp clio too! One of the few in here!
I agree with everything you said above.
Ive done some mods to mine. A K&N filter induction box, clio 2.0 182 alloys (BIG DIFFERENCE) and sprayed some panels. Im now looking into fitting a tuning box to put it up to 80bhp, lot of torque!
BROCK
tick said:so what kinda mpg could i expect on the 80 dci?
Milage does help them get better.2 live said:i have a combi dci mate.
tbh mate.......all cars are cheap on servicing lol....and as for fuel..well....thats not my prob... wots the lowest reading anyones had on the mpg thing anyway....gimme summat to aim for with it at least lol