ClioSport.net
Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.
BMW F21 125d
Damn Parkers is wrong then, as it said for my 53 Plate 172 its 1035kg.... Thinking about it Im sure in my manual it says a similar figure.
Hopefully this is right then
http://www.letstorquebhp.com/fwd.asp
Hopefully this is right then
http://www.letstorquebhp.com/fwd.asp
Last edited:
Poopensharten
ClioSport Club Member
Golf R
Steve
ClioSport Club Member
ST3 8.5
You may open a can of worms with that link, thought the 172 Cup was supposed to be the quickest:quiet: or the 197 was faster than 182:S
clio 182 black /gold
Thanks. This is the info which i need
.
Greeny.
ClioSport Club Member
440i + 182
Woah thats alot of extra weight in my ph2 over a ph1, didnt realise it was that much. Gay.
Also I wouldnt bother moving from a 172 to a 182 unless your 172 is a real shed, waste of money imo, unless you have money to burn of course, but then you would probably have a 200 anyway?
Also I wouldnt bother moving from a 172 to a 182 unless your 172 is a real shed, waste of money imo, unless you have money to burn of course, but then you would probably have a 200 anyway?
Old thread bump.
Anyone else find it suspicious that a ph2 is quoted as 75kg heavier than a ph1, when personally having broken both I really cant see ANYWHERE this weight difference could actually occur?
Its also exactly the same amount as specified as the weight of a driver for kerb weights under EU Directive 95/48/EC, so personally I think the only difference is that the early cars didnt include a 75kg driver.
Anyone got any real world data to concur with or contradict my theory?
Anyone else find it suspicious that a ph2 is quoted as 75kg heavier than a ph1, when personally having broken both I really cant see ANYWHERE this weight difference could actually occur?
Its also exactly the same amount as specified as the weight of a driver for kerb weights under EU Directive 95/48/EC, so personally I think the only difference is that the early cars didnt include a 75kg driver.
Anyone got any real world data to concur with or contradict my theory?
Pug 206 SW, 172 CUP
My Renault book dated 2002 says 1035kg without driver for CB15, CB1C, CB1G, CB1N, CB1S, CB1T. My SPL handbook supplement insert says 1021kg for the cup without driver dated April 2002. Yet the cup brochure clearly says 89kg lighter. Need to get a few models on some scales it seems as Renault don't know what's going on either!
MarkCup
ClioSport Club Member
Alloy bonnet on the ph1 was lighter wasn't it? What about sound deadening?
Pug 206 SW, 172 CUP
What was the heaviest thing you removed? I went from a metal to fibre glass bonnet with frame on an XR2 and the savings weren't massive.
KitsonRis
ClioSport Club Member
I am pretty sure I have seen on here somewhere that someone quoted their stripped out Ph1 172 with perspex windows and a cage was 860Kg. Which is good for me as it makes my power to weight ratio in my stripped out Ph1 quite a lot (well for the size of the car anyway!)
Not really sure that seats and an interior can weigh ~150Kg, depending on how heavy bucket seats to replace the front seats. I would have put the intial weight a lot less
Not really sure that seats and an interior can weigh ~150Kg, depending on how heavy bucket seats to replace the front seats. I would have put the intial weight a lot less
