you only picked up on jesus' comments since it was jesus who posted it imo. if it was someone else you would have left it alone. tbh you'll deny that anyhow, it is just my opinion.
you only picked up on jesus' comments since it was jesus who posted it imo. if it was someone else you would have left it alone. tbh you'll deny that anyhow, it is just my opinion.
spot on 100% correct.
How does this ignore feature work anyway, cant seem to find it??? (Genuine question too, I'm getting bored of the same old routine)
That'll be the difference between i-VTEC and old VTEC.
i-VTEC is a much smoother transistion.
you only picked up on jesus' comments since it was jesus who posted it imo. if it was someone else you would have left it alone. tbh you'll deny that anyhow, it is just my opinion.
spot on 100% correct.
How does this ignore feature work anyway, cant seem to find it??? (Genuine question too, I'm getting bored of the same old routine)
Actually those are your words simpleton,
read at the same level as a 5 year old. Now shove that up your already severely stretched arse and smoke it
prove it's not
I've driven my mates one countless times and whilst I find it horrible to drive and boring it's certainly quicker than a 172. A decent 172 may be able to hold one off until 100+, but a CTR pulls miles harder at the point you change to 5th in the Clio. Handling on most normal roads I'd say the Clio is much better, as it's more accessable to the majority of people, where the CTR feels stiff and skittish, but I'd imagine stock for stock it's a much better track car. I dont think 172's are that quick (if we're talking about full fat phase 2's), I've seen decent valvers easily keep with them to a ton.
Not been in an ATR, I thought the kick in the CTR was quite noticeable tho?!
breadvans!
Well not really. Apparently the dc5 is smooth too as thats i-vtec. Its just the atr and dc2 itr have the old hardcore system.
The Civic is faster round the track - it's right there in that video, and Tiff is a better driver than anyone posting in this thread. Just like, get over it heh. He always does one show boating lap then a quick lap - it just depends whichs bits they decide to show you. Some episodes you see both, some they just tell you the time and show some impressive camera shots - like this one.
Dan
just out of interest, did anyone else pick up on the fact that he says "the type r has 197 bhp where as the 182 has 18 less?"
hmmmm
jamie
You always have to take these sorts of reviews/head-to-heads with a pinch of salt. All of the TV car show hosts are so biased.
Haha
So you pissed on a type R in your 172!? A car that on paper is quicker and in the real world would be so similar in performance that there would not be any difference.
Oh wait you have a cup......
both crap.