Thanks mate, we were ok (although my friend never got the stains out of his pants).Quote: Originally posted by Gary G on 05 March 2005
omar...bloody hell mate hope nobody was hurt!!
for a standard car its not bad (especially for the price)Quote: Originally posted by dave182 on 04 March 2005
Quote: Originally posted by Fred2001Dynamic on 04 March 2005
am i the only person onthe forum to find the 182 "average to good"?????
what is it you have against the 182 fred as a standard car?
I keep seeing you say the same thing but I know ytou are into modified everything, for a standard car do YOU really think it is that bad?
After seeing the pros throw them around at brands I dont think there is anything wrong with the cup suspension, there wasnt much could out corner them.
Thats the thing... newer cars are less communicitive...Quote: Originally posted by BozM on 05 March 2005
Indeed the 182 is quick .. but if im honest the handling isnt up to 205GTIs. Grip maybe, but the car doesnt talk to you like the pug.
lol, well talking of which, these 17s are only for show use only really!! i want a set of 15s with decent tires for every day use! i was thinking either lightweight alloys, dynamique rims again or maybe 172/182 rims. not sure yet. got some nice LARGE wheel adaptors now thoQuote: Originally posted by Loony on 05 March 2005
get some 16s back on the gay disco , 17s really do spoil the drive.
Quote: Originally posted by Tom on 05 March 2005
*waits for h&rs*
dont hold your breath, hence why im getting the Gaz now and if some bilstiens or H&R are released later then i can always sell them on and get the H&Rs instead.
Quote: Originally posted by Loony on 05 March 2005
Quote: Originally posted by Tom on 05 March 2005
*waits for h&rs*
dont hold your breath, hence why im getting the Gaz now and if some bilstiens or H&R are released later then i can always sell them on and get the H&Rs instead.
i thought the gaz option through but im reluctant to be an early adopter. Bilstiens will be nasty.
Scrapped my leda idea too, £1500 a side was a bit excessive.
Quote: Originally posted by meggerman on 05 March 2005
i think the 172/182 represent an exellent starting point for cheap tuning. i.e removing rear seats 17kgs. Adding prorace 2s 24kgs (unsprung also !) adding lightweight recliners 10-15kgs. so on a 182cup with panel filter lets say with 180hp and a kerbweight 1070 - 17 -1 24 - 10 = 40kgs 1030kg with 180hp
BHP per Tonne = 177.56
add induction kit + decat/sportscat smt7 remap = 188hp maybe ? (im trying to be conservative with figure to be realisitc BTW)
not much over £1000 then for a 185bhp per tonne car which could still acheive 40mpg if driven properly especially since its lighter.
for the record that 1hp more than the 250bhp Alfa 147 GTA the exact same as the 255 (250hp) Cio V6 ! and much more than a Focus RS. also just 5bhp pertonne less than a Subaru Impreza WRX PPP with 261bhp.
imagine throttle bodied 215hp slightly stripped 182cup 212 bhppt ! for 3k a FQ300 Evo is 215 bhppt
but if youre going down that route and taking all the niceties out, then you may as well just get a kit car. If you mean a new car that you can slightly alter then yes, theyre hard to knock.
Mate, are you sure the rear seats weigh that much?!Quote: Originally posted by meggerman on 05 March 2005
i think the 172/182 represent an exellent starting point for cheap tuning. i.e removing rear seats 17kgs. Adding prorace 2s 24kgs (unsprung also !) adding lightweight recliners 10-15kgs. so on a 182cup with panel filter lets say with 180hp and a kerbweight 1070 - 17 -1 24 - 10 = 40kgs 1030kg with 180hp
BHP per Tonne = 177.56
add induction kit + decat/sportscat smt7 remap = 188hp maybe ? (im trying to be conservative with figure to be realisitc BTW)
not much over £1000 then for a 185bhp per tonne car which could still acheive 40mpg if driven properly especially since its lighter.
for the record that 1hp more than the 250bhp Alfa 147 GTA the exact same as the 255 (250hp) Cio V6 ! and much more than a Focus RS. also just 5bhp pertonne less than a Subaru Impreza WRX PPP with 261bhp.
imagine throttle bodied 215hp slightly stripped 182cup 212 bhppt ! for 3k a FQ300 Evo is 215 bhppt
take it u mean from standing start then cus most turbo cars at say 60 side be side to a 182 will proberly kill the 182 , wether its stripped or notQuote: Originally posted by meggerman on 05 March 2005
i think the 172/182 represent an exellent starting point for cheap tuning. i.e removing rear seats 17kgs. Adding prorace 2s 24kgs (unsprung also !) adding lightweight recliners 10-15kgs. so on a 182cup with panel filter lets say with 180hp and a kerbweight 1070 - 17 -1 24 - 10 = 40kgs 1030kg with 180hp
BHP per Tonne = 177.56
add induction kit + decat/sportscat smt7 remap = 188hp maybe ? (im trying to be conservative with figure to be realisitc BTW)
not much over £1000 then for a 185bhp per tonne car which could still acheive 40mpg if driven properly especially since its lighter.
for the record that 1hp more than the 250bhp Alfa 147 GTA the exact same as the 255 (250hp) Cio V6 ! and much more than a Focus RS. also just 5bhp pertonne less than a Subaru Impreza WRX PPP with 261bhp.
imagine throttle bodied 215hp slightly stripped 182cup 212 bhppt ! for 3k a FQ300 Evo is 215 bhppt
Quote: Originally posted by meggerman on 05 March 2005
i think the 172/182 represent an exellent starting point for cheap tuning. i.e removing rear seats 17kgs. Adding prorace 2s 24kgs (unsprung also !) adding lightweight recliners 10-15kgs. so on a 182cup with panel filter lets say with 180hp and a kerbweight 1070 - 17 -1 24 - 10 = 40kgs 1030kg with 180hp
BHP per Tonne = 177.56
add induction kit + decat/sportscat smt7 remap = 188hp maybe ? (im trying to be conservative with figure to be realisitc BTW)
not much over £1000 then for a 185bhp per tonne car which could still acheive 40mpg if driven properly especially since its lighter.
for the record that 1hp more than the 250bhp Alfa 147 GTA the exact same as the 255 (250hp) Cio V6 ! and much more than a Focus RS. also just 5bhp pertonne less than a Subaru Impreza WRX PPP with 261bhp.
imagine throttle bodied 215hp slightly stripped 182cup 212 bhppt ! for 3k a FQ300 Evo is 215 bhppt
Thats great yeah but if some 1 with the cars you compared to does the same mods they will be ahead again lol!!!??
an turbo cars are about the torque not just bhp per tonne!
Quote: Originally posted by Jim172CUP on 05 March 2005
Quote: Originally posted by meggerman on 05 March 2005
i think the 172/182 represent an exellent starting point for cheap tuning. i.e removing rear seats 17kgs. Adding prorace 2s 24kgs (unsprung also !) adding lightweight recliners 10-15kgs. so on a 182cup with panel filter lets say with 180hp and a kerbweight 1070 - 17 -1 24 - 10 = 40kgs 1030kg with 180hp
BHP per Tonne = 177.56
add induction kit + decat/sportscat smt7 remap = 188hp maybe ? (im trying to be conservative with figure to be realisitc BTW)
not much over £1000 then for a 185bhp per tonne car which could still acheive 40mpg if driven properly especially since its lighter.
for the record that 1hp more than the 250bhp Alfa 147 GTA the exact same as the 255 (250hp) Cio V6 ! and much more than a Focus RS. also just 5bhp pertonne less than a Subaru Impreza WRX PPP with 261bhp.
imagine throttle bodied 215hp slightly stripped 182cup 212 bhppt ! for 3k a FQ300 Evo is 215 bhppt
but if youre going down that route and taking all the niceties out, then you may as well just get a kit car. If you mean a new car that you can slightly alter then yes, theyre hard to knock.