ClioSport.net

Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.

182 really is a devastatingly quick...



  Nippy white cup


We got our Cup in June 03 and we are still smiling...just love to go out for blasts and its much more stable since we got the Eibachs on, especially the light back end...

Chris
 
  Clio 197


Quote: Originally posted by Gary G on 05 March 2005

omar...bloody hell mate hope nobody was hurt!!
Thanks mate, we were ok (although my friend never got the stains out of his pants).

I blame: icy road, new tyres, no food, bad directions and metropolis street racer.

If youre buying a used car, DONT BUY X524 EAL. Lol.

All that said, a Clio 172.182 would have easily made it, no problem.
 

Boz

  Arctic 182


Indeed the 182 is quick .. but if im honest the handling isnt up to 205GTIs. Grip maybe, but the car doesnt talk to you like the pug.

Carefull all in this weather, ESP is bollox in my opinion and it doesnt take much to stack you vehicle on these icy roads.

Pissed up old basted!!!!!!!!!
 
  B-road bully


yeah watch the weather dude, i was messing about in my 1. 2 8v!! (with sport springs) and i flicked the back out on a roundabout, thought the wheel feel off, scariest moment in the car yet!!
 
  Lionel Richie


Quote: Originally posted by dave182 on 04 March 2005


Quote: Originally posted by Fred2001Dynamic on 04 March 2005

am i the only person onthe forum to find the 182 "average to good"?????

what is it you have against the 182 fred as a standard car?

I keep seeing you say the same thing but I know ytou are into modified everything, for a standard car do YOU really think it is that bad?

After seeing the pros throw them around at brands I dont think there is anything wrong with the cup suspension, there wasnt much could out corner them.
for a standard car its not bad (especially for the price)

I just dont like the feel of the car. Turn in is good, but the back end just feels to "sketchy"

and dont get me started on the body roll!!!!!

plus i hate all the ESP, ABS etc etc etc



100mph through the left hander at Bruntingthorpe??? try 125mph in a properly set up Cup on coilovers!

TBH dave a std 182 is a good car, but theres HUGE room for improvement

the biggest thing that annoys me about the 182 is owners "believing the hype" renault feed them!!!

eg

The special michelin tyres on the 182 are the best ever

The "cup" suspension is fantastic

etc etc etc

IMO its mainly used to sell cars



Its seems to me people are scared to try other things with the 182 (the hardcore are emerging!!!!!) I mean FFS its only tyres!!!!!

TBH i much prefered the mini cooper S to the 182 (comparing standard to standard)
 


i wish mine handled as well :cry:

mine cant do anything in this weather, i hope its just the buggered shocks & sh*t tires i have on there & nothing else :cry:
 

Rich-D

ClioSport Club Member
  E90 LCI 330d


Quote: Originally posted by BozM on 05 March 2005


Indeed the 182 is quick .. but if im honest the handling isnt up to 205GTIs. Grip maybe, but the car doesnt talk to you like the pug.
Thats the thing... newer cars are less communicitive...
 
  BMW 120i Sport


Quote:
TBH dave a std 182 is a good car, but theres HUGE room for improvement

the biggest thing that annoys me about the 182 is owners "believing the hype" renault feed them!!!

eg

The special michelin tyres on the 182 are the best ever

The "cup" suspension is fantastic


Theyre obviously going to have to hit a happy medium between usable road car and track day stormer. I was out in a mates P1 and it was far too harsh for our roads, great on a track probably but i dont think i could live with it everyday. Similarly on the 182, ok the cup suspension doesnt eliminate all roll and it could be tightned further for track use - but the number of potholes and roadworks where i am at the mo would break my back on coilovers. Id go from loving the suspension & car to hating it.

Having driven cars with exactlos, toyos, goodrichs, eagle F1s - the Exaltos definitely gave the best grip in the wet and on cornering.
 


tbh my coilovers on the 172 made the car a smoother ride on poor surfaces. but like you say its striking a happy medium, most owners probably wont be as hardcore as some of us on here, so things like super low suspension might not suit their daily drive, the give and roll will normally save less able drivers from themselves in some circumstances that a set up with a "grip grip grip then gone in a flash" would see them off into the scenery. Basically for the money i dont think you can get a better new car, the spec performance and handling is better than any of the competion at this price. you have a capable car as standard that if you have the cash you can mod into something that will outperform alot more expensive equipment on a b road or track day.
 


personally i like the way it tells you youre going faster than normal. A bit of over confidence can put you in a situation your skills may not be able to pull you through the otherside.
 


Quote: Originally posted by Loony on 05 March 2005

get some 16s back on the gay disco ;), 17s really do spoil the drive.
lol, well talking of which, these 17s are only for show use only really!! i want a set of 15s with decent tires for every day use! i was thinking either lightweight alloys, dynamique rims again or maybe 172/182 rims. not sure yet. got some nice LARGE wheel adaptors now tho ;)
 


Quote: Originally posted by Tom on 05 March 2005

*waits for h&rs*



dont hold your breath, hence why im getting the Gaz now and if some bilstiens or H&R are released later then i can always sell them on and get the H&Rs instead.
 

Tom

ClioSport Club Member
  EV (s)


Quote: Originally posted by Loony on 05 March 2005


Quote: Originally posted by Tom on 05 March 2005

*waits for h&rs*




dont hold your breath, hence why im getting the Gaz now and if some bilstiens or H&R are released later then i can always sell them on and get the H&Rs instead.




i thought the gaz option through but im reluctant to be an early adopter. Bilstiens will be nasty.

Scrapped my leda idea too, £1500 a side was a bit excessive.
 


yup i looked into leda cant justify 1500 on suspension on what is effectively a 13k car new. ill see how the gaz go if im happy they will stay if not when an alternative arrives (IF it does) then i may jump ship. im looking into a set of pro race 2s in white to reduce the unsprung mass too so should also help the handling.
 
  Mini Cooper S sport


HEHEHE I saw this on the active topic list and I just KNEW it was a Roy Munson topic!

If anyone loves their car, its you..

Must say, Ive not tried fast cornering in the 172, but then Im a girl and probably drive it like one - I must find some country roads one day.
 
  MKIII 138


i think the 172/182 represent an exellent starting point for cheap tuning. i.e removing rear seats 17kgs. Adding prorace 2s 24kgs (unsprung also !) adding lightweight recliners 10-15kgs. so on a 182cup with panel filter lets say with 180hp and a kerbweight 1070 - 17 -1 24 - 10 = 40kgs 1030kg with 180hp

BHP per Tonne = 177.56

add induction kit + decat/sportscat smt7 remap = 188hp maybe ? (im trying to be conservative with figure to be realisitc BTW)

not much over £1000 then for a 185bhp per tonne car which could still acheive 40mpg if driven properly especially since its lighter.

for the record that 1hp more than the 250bhp Alfa 147 GTA the exact same as the 255 (250hp) Cio V6 ! and much more than a Focus RS. also just 5bhp pertonne less than a Subaru Impreza WRX PPP with 261bhp.

imagine throttle bodied 215hp slightly stripped 182cup 212 bhppt ! for 3k a FQ300 Evo is 215 bhppt
 


Quote: Originally posted by meggerman on 05 March 2005


i think the 172/182 represent an exellent starting point for cheap tuning. i.e removing rear seats 17kgs. Adding prorace 2s 24kgs (unsprung also !) adding lightweight recliners 10-15kgs. so on a 182cup with panel filter lets say with 180hp and a kerbweight 1070 - 17 -1 24 - 10 = 40kgs 1030kg with 180hp

BHP per Tonne = 177.56

add induction kit + decat/sportscat smt7 remap = 188hp maybe ? (im trying to be conservative with figure to be realisitc BTW)

not much over £1000 then for a 185bhp per tonne car which could still acheive 40mpg if driven properly especially since its lighter.

for the record that 1hp more than the 250bhp Alfa 147 GTA the exact same as the 255 (250hp) Cio V6 ! and much more than a Focus RS. also just 5bhp pertonne less than a Subaru Impreza WRX PPP with 261bhp.

imagine throttle bodied 215hp slightly stripped 182cup 212 bhppt ! for 3k a FQ300 Evo is 215 bhppt









but if youre going down that route and taking all the niceties out, then you may as well just get a kit car. If you mean a new car that you can slightly alter then yes, theyre hard to knock.
 
  182>FRS>VX220 now 350Z


Quote: Originally posted by meggerman on 05 March 2005


i think the 172/182 represent an exellent starting point for cheap tuning. i.e removing rear seats 17kgs. Adding prorace 2s 24kgs (unsprung also !) adding lightweight recliners 10-15kgs. so on a 182cup with panel filter lets say with 180hp and a kerbweight 1070 - 17 -1 24 - 10 = 40kgs 1030kg with 180hp

BHP per Tonne = 177.56

add induction kit + decat/sportscat smt7 remap = 188hp maybe ? (im trying to be conservative with figure to be realisitc BTW)

not much over £1000 then for a 185bhp per tonne car which could still acheive 40mpg if driven properly especially since its lighter.

for the record that 1hp more than the 250bhp Alfa 147 GTA the exact same as the 255 (250hp) Cio V6 ! and much more than a Focus RS. also just 5bhp pertonne less than a Subaru Impreza WRX PPP with 261bhp.

imagine throttle bodied 215hp slightly stripped 182cup 212 bhppt ! for 3k a FQ300 Evo is 215 bhppt
Mate, are you sure the rear seats weigh that much?!
 


Quote: Originally posted by meggerman on 05 March 2005


i think the 172/182 represent an exellent starting point for cheap tuning. i.e removing rear seats 17kgs. Adding prorace 2s 24kgs (unsprung also !) adding lightweight recliners 10-15kgs. so on a 182cup with panel filter lets say with 180hp and a kerbweight 1070 - 17 -1 24 - 10 = 40kgs 1030kg with 180hp

BHP per Tonne = 177.56

add induction kit + decat/sportscat smt7 remap = 188hp maybe ? (im trying to be conservative with figure to be realisitc BTW)

not much over £1000 then for a 185bhp per tonne car which could still acheive 40mpg if driven properly especially since its lighter.

for the record that 1hp more than the 250bhp Alfa 147 GTA the exact same as the 255 (250hp) Cio V6 ! and much more than a Focus RS. also just 5bhp pertonne less than a Subaru Impreza WRX PPP with 261bhp.

imagine throttle bodied 215hp slightly stripped 182cup 212 bhppt ! for 3k a FQ300 Evo is 215 bhppt
take it u mean from standing start then cus most turbo cars at say 60 side be side to a 182 will proberly kill the 182 , wether its stripped or not
 
  Ford F-150 5.4 V8


Quote: Originally posted by meggerman on 05 March 2005


i think the 172/182 represent an exellent starting point for cheap tuning. i.e removing rear seats 17kgs. Adding prorace 2s 24kgs (unsprung also !) adding lightweight recliners 10-15kgs. so on a 182cup with panel filter lets say with 180hp and a kerbweight 1070 - 17 -1 24 - 10 = 40kgs 1030kg with 180hp

BHP per Tonne = 177.56

add induction kit + decat/sportscat smt7 remap = 188hp maybe ? (im trying to be conservative with figure to be realisitc BTW)

not much over £1000 then for a 185bhp per tonne car which could still acheive 40mpg if driven properly especially since its lighter.

for the record that 1hp more than the 250bhp Alfa 147 GTA the exact same as the 255 (250hp) Cio V6 ! and much more than a Focus RS. also just 5bhp pertonne less than a Subaru Impreza WRX PPP with 261bhp.

imagine throttle bodied 215hp slightly stripped 182cup 212 bhppt ! for 3k a FQ300 Evo is 215 bhppt









Thats great yeah but if some 1 with the cars you compared to does the same mods they will be ahead again lol!!!??

an turbo cars are about the torque not just bhp per tonne!
 
  MKIII 138


Quote: Originally posted by Jim172CUP on 05 March 2005


Quote: Originally posted by meggerman on 05 March 2005


i think the 172/182 represent an exellent starting point for cheap tuning. i.e removing rear seats 17kgs. Adding prorace 2s 24kgs (unsprung also !) adding lightweight recliners 10-15kgs. so on a 182cup with panel filter lets say with 180hp and a kerbweight 1070 - 17 -1 24 - 10 = 40kgs 1030kg with 180hp

BHP per Tonne = 177.56

add induction kit + decat/sportscat smt7 remap = 188hp maybe ? (im trying to be conservative with figure to be realisitc BTW)

not much over £1000 then for a 185bhp per tonne car which could still acheive 40mpg if driven properly especially since its lighter.

for the record that 1hp more than the 250bhp Alfa 147 GTA the exact same as the 255 (250hp) Cio V6 ! and much more than a Focus RS. also just 5bhp pertonne less than a Subaru Impreza WRX PPP with 261bhp.

imagine throttle bodied 215hp slightly stripped 182cup 212 bhppt ! for 3k a FQ300 Evo is 215 bhppt










but if youre going down that route and taking all the niceties out, then you may as well just get a kit car. If you mean a new car that you can slightly alter then yes, theyre hard to knock.


but you still have aircon driver/passenger airbags ABS/ESP same economy if not better (not on TBs though) safety cell with crumple zones. Normal seat belts CD player + changer Auto rain wipers / Stowage areas only thing gone is back seats (could keep em though) have you ever ben in a kit car there sprtan and usually dont even have a horn let alone a quiet ride and comfort like the 182. Its nowhere near like owning a kit car i have to disagree. its simply adding lighter seats as the 182cup doesnt have side airbags and adding lighter wheels + usual tuning stuff to free up some ponnies and stop the car sounding like a sewing machine i.e induction zorst and tie it up with a remap to maximise the extra airflow. everthing else is standard and looks performs like a normal car of the 182s price. In fact you have more than other cars at that price that are family cars.

yes rear seats in 172 weigh around 17kgs. btw

it makes me laugh at the Torque statements people make ok.. ok i know its a diesel but neither my m8s 270cdi merc 170hp 300lbft or my bros much lighter Fabia VRS with 192hp and 320lbft are any faster in the midrange.. i have vids and RR print outs from jabba sport confirmed LBFT and Vids of 0-60 and 30-70 etc and a 30-90 but we recently had an unexpected blast against each other from 30 upto 70ish and i was exaclty the same speed as the VRS in the midrange although it has more hp and more torque by far ?!? most turbo cars were talking about i.e 4wd like i mentioned weigh around 1400kgs not 1030-1070kgs. past 100mph sure they can pull all they like past the 182 but i dunno if i want to travel that fast in the speeding climate the UK has at the moment.

basically roy was right. for the money and if you tune a bit further you can have a car that will hardly ever be embarassed by your chaved up big hp calibras imprezas or business men types in their Uber 7series BMW saloon with the big V8 they will be fairly pissed at a Reno Clio keeping pace.

[Edited by meggerman on 05 March 2005 at 1:15pm]
 


Top