Clio 197
Any excuse for a just-washed and just-fitted thread!
meggerman said:doesnt the strut brace need to be mounted on the top of the struts to be effected ? how is that actually stoppin fles in the posistion its in ??
omar said:The flex is in the body of the car itself.
So the two suspension towers held together by a brace will be more effective.
1) reduces flex when cornering.
2) keeps them stable under v.hard braking.
There's so much flex in the body that my ecu holder snapped at an airfield day... I know of a few others who've had similar occurances.
Roy Munson said:What I dont get about these braces, is that you seemingly have to drill the car up? Err no thanks.
edde said:There are no H and R's yet for the 182. Handling is superb on it though better than the 172's with springs. Plus its nice and soft and relitively cheap to do.
It looks higher than I remember though.
Needs a monster 2.2 dci under the bonnet first.
JoelDee said:Looking good fella is it lowered?
meggerman said:have you noticed any difference with the strut brace added ??
when my bro got the seat strut on his vrs it seemed to drive sharper i.e where you put the steering wheel it went rather than very close and it also seemed to stop roll and the most noticble thing was that it put the power down a lot better.
edde said:There are no H and R's yet for the 182. Handling is superb on it though better than the 172's with springs. Plus its nice and soft and relitively cheap to do.
It looks higher than I remember though.
Needs a monster 2.2 dci under the bonnet first.
Its not got spacers its just the wheels offset which widens the track.meggerman said:omar where you get your spacers from ?? i was interested in widening the cup`s track even further 16mm isnt too drastic and H&R`s will still lower a good 40mm i expect without hitting the arch liner. 40mm is all i want anyways now i have been through the arse ache of fitting the carbon splitter i dont wanna rip it off.
also once spaced do you have to adjust the camber or anyother settings. is it recommended ??
edde said:Its not got spacers its just the wheels offset which widens the track.
You have to have the tracking done after lowering the car.
The car is superb though much better than a 172 with just springs it not figetty or too hard etc. Only thing to be careful off the 182 dampers can fail and some dealerships might try being awquard about replacing them however the 182 dampers can fail anyway. The 182 Cup pack should have been like this realy. its makes for a much better car IMO. the stock suspension can be a bit soft and rolly.
gt_gaz said:am i right in saying the 182 has the 172 cup track anyway?
the 172 cup has a different wheel offset to a standard 172 wheel, hense making the track wider, and the 182 had redesigned hubs to get the same track
The 182 handles better than the Cup IMO. You could get some spacers on your car to widen the track a bit more some 5mm spacers are only cheap I've got some I might try on the track this weekend. The only thing to remember is to get the longer bolts if your getting big spacers.gt_gaz said:am i right in saying the 182 has the 172 cup track anyway?
the 172 cup has a different wheel offset to a standard 172 wheel, hense making the track wider, and the 182 had redesigned hubs to get the same track
gt_gaz said:am i right in saying the 182 has the 172 cup track anyway?
the 172 cup has a different wheel offset to a standard 172 wheel, hense making the track wider, and the 182 had redesigned hubs to get the same track