3.0 v6 in clio 16v

[phantome46]

Is it possible to get a 3.0 v6 lump in a clio 16v?

 

[clio__chris]

in the back? of course!

 

[The Big Yin]

Anything is possible

IIRC there was a guy on here who had put one in the rear

 

[Dan@SJM]

would dread the wiring tbh! the twin engined valver is being a nightmare!

 

[AmirClio]

You building a twin engined valver dan?

 

[Daz]

I'd never even attempt it - surely there are better ways to get the same power.. like a tuned Audi TT lump (Which can be done .. Some seriously cool work gone into that! )

 

[Englebert]

Yeah, VAG power would be cheaper and lighter but then it sounds really crap compared to a V6...

 

[16v_jon]

better off with the pug 406 3.0 v6 same engine designed for FWD

 

[Ben j]

smallblock V8 fits

 

[terribleclio]

better off with the pug 406 3.0 v6 same engine designed for FWD

i do believe the clio v6 lump is from a laguna which is FWD they use the whole front end setup just lock the steering iirc.

 

[edde]

Terribleclios' right the V6 CLio is just a Laguna V6 drove into the back of a Clio.
The Pug V6 is the same engine realy.

 

[phantome46]

so it wont go in the front then?

 

[edde]

so it wont go in the front then?

Not without a lot of modifying its a bit engine the V6 the Vauxhall V6 would maybe be better as its smaller but best stick it in the back more spare.

 

[BenR]

if you really want a v6 you might try the rover v6.

 

[Dan@SJM]

You building a twin engined valver dan?

Its an RT at the moment!

 

[Englebert]

if you really want a v6 you might try the rover v6.

True, the KV6 will bound to be the easiest to fit and will make the handling not as bad as it could be...