This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
say, we all want to (or already did) fit better air filter, exhaust systems, suspension kits, wheels/tyres...
but didnt renault spend millions and millions to develop the clio? did they spend all that money and then fitted the car with unappropriate tyres?
just a thought
I think what U mean to say is if Renault spend all the cash developing a new car then theyd build it the best they can.
The problem is with accountants & least cost engineering..!! The designer might have the desire to use the best bits in the car but if the accountants say they are too expensive then a compromise has to be sought.
I think the Mclaren F1 is one of the few cars that have been built without the accountants having their hand in. Thats why it costs 70k+ to change the exhaust system..!!!
road cars are built to a compromise. sure they could make the car handle better by dropping it 40mm or so, but then the slearence is reduced, and the general population mite sturggle.
sure you could make it quicker with stainless exhaust and the like, but this puts the cost of manufacture up, and so the retail cost.
Ill be the first to apologise for my rather blunt reply and I have deleted it. Im at work and surrounded by moaning c**ts because they cant eat at their desk. Not my fault that they cant not eat anything over the course of 3.5 hours... Never mind.
I think the word were looking for compromise when Renault are designing their cars. I mean, look how many people bought 172s and modded them rather than getting a Cup and doing the same mods to that...?
Wouldnt it be boring if all cars were sorted out of the box though? Manufacturers have to think about emmisions and safety and blah blah. Dont forget that probably only 1 in 20 rs clios ever gets fettled by its first owner