Renault Laguna Coupe
LOL Agree !Quote: Originally posted by Spammy on 16 August 2005
Get it on the RR, before and after, see the real outputs!
And me. In woolies window on a saturday afternoon.Quote: Originally posted by jonnyboy on 16 August 2005
bare my arse if those mods get 200 bhp on a 182
Click on the gallery button for more pics.Quote: Originally posted by hip_spasm on 16 August 2005
What a sh*t article. No pictures of the zorst or the filter.
If you was gonna put a decat on it there wouldnt be much point paying extra for a modified version with warranty then voiding it ,you might aswell buy a 182 for £12000 and send it to one of the tuning companies,Quote: Originally posted by badinvincible on 16 August 2005
Bung on a decat and get more hp.
Say again - no exhaust or filter pics!Quote: Originally posted by Max172cup on 17 August 2005
Click on the gallery button for more pics.Quote: Originally posted by hip_spasm on 16 August 2005
What a sh*t article. No pictures of the zorst or the filter.
Quote: Originally posted by lagerlout1 on 18 August 2005
There was an autocar road test that clocked a 182 @ 6.3 to sixty...
really !!!
i thought they were just under 7 secs !!
Quote: Originally posted by Fred2001Dynamic on 18 August 2005
Floodie, its called marketing, simple terms, power figures sell products
but if you cant back it up with HARD proof, then its a bit misleading
Quote: Originally posted by Fred2001Dynamic on 19 August 2005
well exactly, we all know the power figures on the 172/182s vary, mainly due to the inlet mis matching from factory
i dont want to get envolved with a sl*gging match etc, and i hate when people sl*g off other tunning companys, but i do believe those figures they "quote" are slightly optimistic
all the power figures we quote are done on an engine dyno, which is as gospel as it gets