awesome mate! £700 is cheap for suspension
IMO Leda don't even make it onto my top 5 list
Also they are only height adjustable, damping is fixed, so they are not as good as the Leda's which are.
Also they are only height adjustable, damping is fixed, so they are not as good as the Leda's which are.
Without starting a huuuuuuuuuuge arguement coilovers having damping adjustment does not make them superior to those without. I draw the forums attention to the case of Gaz Vs H&R.. I rest my case your honour, lol
Come on then Fred what's your Top 5IMO Leda don't even make it onto my top 5 list
in no particular order
H&R
Bilstein
KW
Sachs
and ohlins (not used them on a car though)
Bilstein humm, there low end replacing stuff isn't very good in my experiance. Renault stuffs better.in no particular order
H&R
Bilstein
KW
Sachs
and ohlins (not used them on a car though)
in no particular order
H&R
Bilstein
KW
Sachs
and ohlins (not used them on a car though)
youve never used ohlins but you rate them,
IMO Leda don't even make it onto my top 5 list
PMSL! Perfect example of why you shouldn't listen to Fred's opinion. He know's feck all!
He has stated that he wouldn't recommend non TUV approved coilovers.
The Bilstein B14 are not TUV approved. Also they are only height adjustable, damping is fixed, so they are not as good as the Leda's which are. The B16's are, but they don't make a set for the clio.
If you are spending £700, I would use the tried and tested H&R's, which use Bilstein dampers anyway.
Also they are only height adjustable, damping is fixed, so they are not as good as the Leda's which are.
Without starting a huuuuuuuuuuge arguement coilovers having damping adjustment does not make them superior to those without. I draw the forums attention to the case of Gaz Vs H&R.. I rest my case your honour, lol