Sorry, at this point i will have to strongly disagree.
Youll all dispute me no end, but the problem is that traditional runout tests do not tell the full story, and unfortunately....the age old myth has been cast in stone for so long that people no longer bother to contest it.
In all cases where a vibration is felt and runout is measured its almost always from pad deposits or thickness variation. he disc itself can cone where there is a rigid hub or very tight mouning bell. Due to the design of the disc having only 1 side of the swept area actually mounted to the mounting bell. With temp variatons that change rapidly (going through puddles etc) can lift the edge of the mounted side up, coning the disc and leading to runout from the inner edge to the outer.......yet this is still nto warp as the face is still concentric to eachother.
The other case where its not pad depositing is where the friction material between the vanes collapse and create a ripple, leading to thickness variation, yet to total striaght edge is not affected and the brakes have not warped.
A traditional warp as many concieve where one face of the disc is convex and the otehr concave can only truely occur when a crack propagates from teh edge of the disk and the expansion of the matierial collapses around it.
I say most of the time its friction material depositing primarily because of incorrect bedding of the pad and disc together. Most go for the 200 mile light braking, in which case, even with light braking say off a motorway the same heat is generated, just over a longer preriod.....ad they sit at a standstill at the junction/roundabout below......this is where their new brakes deposit material onto the discs and then they thikn theyve warped the disc.
If they bedded them properly, like i have explained many a time before, then there wouldnt be a problem.