Has anybody here used the 24-105 F4L IS lens? I am quite seriously thinking of skipping the 28-135 and going for the big brother instead.
Worth the extra?
A thread just for you..
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=433517
Has anybody here used the 24-105 F4L IS lens? I am quite seriously thinking of skipping the 28-135 and going for the big brother instead.
Worth the extra?
Has anybody here used the 24-105 F4L IS lens? I am quite seriously thinking of skipping the 28-135 and going for the big brother instead.
Worth the extra?
A thread just for you..
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=433517
Shot on ISO800 at 1/4 sec from the EXIF, so must have been pretty darn dark!very nice photos mate the first one is good, it would be interesting to see what it would look like if you had used a faster shutter speed aswell
Must admit the generally dark, low saturation feel is something I often see pictures shot with a 400D. Don't know why that is!? Reckon my eyes see in "vivid" so I like my pictures that way and Canons tend not to favour that .
The 10-20 wangle is a favourite tool of my UE buddies because obviously it allows you to capture a lot more in confined buildings. In fact I know folk who explore with nothing else but that!
I'd like to purchase the:
50mm f1.8
24-105 f4.0 L IS
and the EF-S 18-55 3.5-5.6 IS to replace my kit kens (that got damaged in vegas) to keep a wide lens as its nice and cheap.
those are my purchases for this year i think hopefully.
where from?i've ordered the 50mm f1.8 but I've been waiting for a week now for it to be dispatched, its on back order.
i got a shoot in a castle coming up soon.... will be shooting mainly with the 10-20 i guess sometimes it annoys me lol i used to love it and love the effects but u have to go carefull shooting in rooms and check the viewfinder and also your shots to make sure nothing is being to squuuuwifff lol would love a corrective lens.
Obviously I am using Nikon but thinking about the 85mm f/1.8 Nikon lense for portrait and general duties. Anyone used one?
I'd like to purchase the:
50mm f1.8
24-105 f4.0 L IS
and the EF-S 18-55 3.5-5.6 IS to replace my kit kens (that got damaged in vegas) to keep a wide lens as its nice and cheap.
those are my purchases for this year i think hopefully.
Obviously I am using Nikon but thinking about the 85mm f/1.8 Nikon lense for portrait and general duties. Anyone used one?
Can anyone recommend me a good Macro lense for a 400D?
CHeers
Matt
Indeed, 50mm is 80mm, like I said, you would need a 35mm for true 50mm, but the 50mm (80mm) provide a pretty accurate life image.
Indeed, 50mm is 80mm, like I said, you would need a 35mm for true 50mm, but the 50mm (80mm) provide a pretty accurate life image.
Obviously this comes into it, I said within reason and hoped no one would say anything. If you are taking a portrait you should position it so you have room to back away (studio). Obviously not ideal for weddings..
They don't all have an f stop of 1.8, the canon 100mm is f/2 and I think the Nikon 105 is f/2 as well. I would never use f/1.4 for portrait because you would struggle a lot with focus, for instance you would find that the eyes would be in and the tip of the nose out..I would only get the f/1.4 for UE and night shots, the fact it can be used for portrait is a bonus.