Quote: Originally posted by 1.6 16v on 25 April 2003
Robfenn wrote
"If i wanted a warm hatch i would get a VTR or something before getting a 172, the 1.6 isnt a warm hatch, its more of a quick supermini. No offence to any 1.6 owners, its just what i think."
Robfenn so am i right in thinking you think the vtr is a warm hatch and that the 1.6 16v is just quick.
If they had a race i know which car id fancy and that would be the "quick supermini"
Personally id describe 172/vts as hot hatches and 1.6 16v/vtrs as warm hatches.
Vtr stats and and 1.6 16v stats are very similair and from real world experience id say the the 1.6 16v has the edge
Im sure that the clio would have a VTR in a straight line, it has more power and torque so its not suprisisng, but the VTR has more sporting intentions whereas the Clio is meant to be a comfortable drive. No doubt a Clio could get somewhere just as fast as the VTR but i think youd have more fun in the Saxo doing it, which for me, is what its all about. Not that ill ever get a Saxo, ill twiddle my thumbs until i can afford a Cup.
-Rob