Had a black CTR before the cup and it was an amazing car. Took it to nearly 100k and was still mint and never missed a beat.
They are faster than you think aswell, i think it was alot faster than my cup. Honda is built better and people see it as better car.
Other good points of CTR:
-huge boot
-Nice position of gear box
-engine is amazing when on vtec
Bad points:
-Servicing is costy
-petrol is bad if you always have it on the vtec
-Handling is not good, alot of torque steer and danger in the wet!
Couldnt of put it better myself :approve:
not sure if it been said but what about a integra? much better than both cars imo in pretty much every way rare handle much better look better imo quicker, defo worth a look if youve not thought about it.
I take it you're talking DC2? if you are then you're looking at a car which is 7 years older. Finding a decent one which the interior is still in good condition as well as bodywork is RARE!!! And costly for the age of vehicle. Plus you won't get any service history with a JDM one (and no one would get a uk one would they!).
However, they are simply awesome cars!! My mate had his 96 spec one when I had my 210bhp Ibiza Cupra, I loved having a blast in it every now and again! Crazy handling capabilities! But I couldn't of driven it everyday.
The DC5 is in a different league and I was going to get one when I had my TT but insurance was just ridiculous. I still would like a DC5 at some point.
Thatll be the same as a Clio then? If you batter any car up and down the rev range obviously fuel consumption will drop.
CTR's are chain driven and only require valve clearence every 24k/2 years @ a cost of £220
Whats a service at an independant, £60? Hardly bank breaking stuff!
Drive any car in the wet like a hero and you will crash, and die