ClioSport.net

Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.

Clio windscreen advice...



  Nothing yet.....
I am desperate to get a Clio (fed up of sharing my mums KA!), and I quite fancied a DIY Cat D repair job, I know I can get my dad to help with the bodywork and engine, however the car I am looking at has a crack in the windscreen that definitley needs to replaced! I was wondering if anyone had any idea on the cost?? The car is a 2004 Expression 16V, I'd appreciate any help! Thankyou! :)
 
  Nothing yet.....
Haha! Sounds a good idea! Wish I could claim the rest on insurance... but I didn't crash it!! It's a bit of a mess.... but I want one so badly and I'm not super rich so it's a DIY job for me!!
 
  Mercedes C Class Sport
there could be dangers of this..but you could probs pick up a windscreen in a breakers yard? correct me if im wrong
 
  www.renparts.co.uk
up to you really... i would fix it then claim on the insurance as you just pay the excess (on most fully comp policies) or you could have a new windscreen fitted... if you buy a used one from a breakers you will struggle to clean up the surfaces and get autoglass etc to fit it as its a lot of hassle....
 

MRBILLYUK

ClioSport Club Member
  FF Jeden Osiem Dwa
Just one flaw in claiming on your insurance . I'm assuming it doesn't have a valid MOT and would need a VIC test before its deemed as road worthy . So if it was repaired then it would also need to pass an MOT before it can be insured and it won't pass an MOT with a broken windscreen .
 
  BMW M4; S1000 RR
Just one flaw in claiming on your insurance . I'm assuming it doesn't have a valid MOT and would need a VIC test before its deemed as road worthy . So if it was repaired then it would also need to pass an MOT before it can be insured and it won't pass an MOT with a broken windscreen .

(that's cat C mate)
 

MRBILLYUK

ClioSport Club Member
  FF Jeden Osiem Dwa
^^^ Ok . If its written off , will it still have a valid MOT or does that become null and void ? If so, then what i said still applies .
 
  172 /megane cab
just make sure in aint cracked cos the body has twisted in any way cos every screen they wil fit will just crack and lift off the glue
 
  Nothing yet.....
It was a front collision and has done no structural damage hence the Cat D, but I cant see any twisting??? Ahh so confusing!!


Can I post links for ebay on to here?? Cos if I can could someone have a look at it for me.... may spot something I didn't!!
 
Last edited:
  Shhh
if it still has an mot, you shall be ok..

repair it, then claim off the full comp £50 excess...though i think its fraud.. or something like that at the end of the day.
 
  BMW M4; S1000 RR
I think there's a big misconception with the term "written off".

It's a term for a body not wanting to persue the recovery of an object.

Simplest explanation which I thought of earlier. If you drop a crisp in dog s**t, you write it off, it's not worth picking back and dusting off, a little extreme I know but hey there's a reason.

On the other hand, I could drop a crisp on my kitchen floor, IMO perfectly fine to eat, but if I just couldn't see the sense in bending down to pick it up, I'd leave it again although it's a very minor problem (me not being bothered).

Insurers writing off a car from their agreements with the policy holders is along the same lines.

In one case, it could be a super rare car, and the insurers want nothing to do with paying for the replacement parts that will have to be custom made or sourced from Quebec.

On the other hand, it could actually be a real case in that the car will never be the same again (like the crisp in dog s**t), and that they'll write it off because it's simply irredeemable.

Cat X is what your car will have on record if you've ever claimed for a prang. It could be as minor as a new bumper.

Cat F is for cars damaged by fire, (off topic.. I once heard there was a V6 on fire, anyone else heard that??)

Cat D is just the insurers not wanting to bother with a possibly costly repair compared to simply giving you a book (under) valued amount for the loss of property, I would say more often than not, the customer takes that figure although I do not recommend it to anyone.

Cat C is when there is the car will cost a lot more to repair (at main dealer parts and labour rates) bringing it back to roadworthy status. The car WILL need a VIC test before it's legal to join the road network again.

Cat B is serious damage, spare parts may be taken from the vehicle before it is inevitably crushed.

Cat A is.... Well as bad as a crash can get, the police will have it crushed, and no parts may be taken from it.

IMO OF COURSE!!
 
  Nothing yet.....
I know that :), just was wondering if the cost was worth it and whether I'd need to put it through an MOT after.

And I thought Cat C means there is structural damage - hence the need of a VIC test
 
This is just what I thought...

Cat D write offs dont loose their log books.

Cat C ones do, and hence need a VIC check to make sure it is actually the same car when you apply for it again.

Possibly :)
 


Top