Ive never driven any of these modern hot hatches, so some of you might as well stop reading now!
However, I would consider that Im a hardcore hot-hatch fan - and thus fall directly into this sales category. I love hot hatches and, despite my Renault bias, am not afriad to acknowledge another good hot hatch.
To me, the appeal of the two cars is very different. The Mini is a really fab car, no doubting that. Its also got a good following of enthusiast drivers - which is good, as I expected like many that it would unfairly attract only the Hairdresser Brigade (you know, white convertible Suzuki Jimny with wide arches types). The Clio 172/Cup seems also to attract hardcore fans too - but ones that appreciate different qualities.
To me, the 172 and Cup really look the part of a no-nonsense hot hatch - along with the 205 GTi, 5 Turbo, 106 GTi, Clio 16v/Williams and possibly the Golf GTi Mk 1. The Mini is a bit too stylish for this bunch, but thus loses out on hot-hatch cred.
The Clio and Mini are based on very different basic cars with different clientele in mind - both by design and by buying realities.
If its considered relevant, Im going to be buying a second car (for work etc) in about nine months, for myself and girlfriend to share. The boggo Mini is high on the list becuase it makes a lot of sense in town - but not because its got hot hatch appeal. See what I mean?
The Mini may be a fantastic package and probably more tuneable than the 172/Cup (due to the supercharger - wheee!!) - but in hot hatch terms its going to get a beating from a lot of established favourites.
It was a shame that the Autocar article made so much fuss over the 172 to Cup linkage, but when it talked of the Williams it forgot about the 16v!! Still, the Williams was more of a moded 16v than the Cup is a moded 172. Renault should have given the Cup 200ccs more, better transmission and some gold wheels too!!