ClioSport.net

Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.

Difference between cup and normal



Without being picky, this statement below isnt actually correct, technically, as there was never any leather rear bench in the 182Cup regardless of Recaro option. It is true of the 'full fat' 182 with recaro option though...

Recaro seat pack - Ambla/dinamica black front + Graphic charcoal rear seat (no leather on rear seats if you picked the Reacaro seats (this Recaro seats was only an option on later cars)

Yep that is picky. However if you read the article you'll work out how I made the mistake as its coppied form the above post rarther than as I should have done corrected it.


One thing I would say against the FF is that the rubber steering wheel inserts have been known to fall apart - that is about the only pro I would give to the Cup :)

Cup has the same wheel which falls apart.


Cups are more expensive because of the amount of claims. They get binned. Often. Although in my opinion that's down to people buying a Cup (and there are many on here who are like it!!) and thinking that because they own a stonking hot hatch that it turns them into ragnotti himself. When in fact they are clueless boy racers and run out of talent at the first sign of bad weather. lol.
I thnk another bigger thing was that they were cheap cars for the power etc and only bought for the Hp not like a normal 172 which had nice toys etc hence there were bound to be driven very hard.
 


Top