Hi all
is it worth doing an EPAS conversion?
is it worth doing an EPAS conversion?
What is the rough cost of doing the conversion?Got EPAS on both of mine and as other people have said, it hasn’t got the feel of HPAS but the peace of mind and extra space in the engine bay makes up for it for me.
Best answer. Thank you for that.The issue is the non sport electric column is designed specifically for cars with smaller tyres, less mechanical trail and self aligning torque. If you run sticky rubber and increased caster the torsion bar and assistance calibration cant cope and you'll have 'laggy' steering that needs to have the torsion bar twisted a lot (all the way sometimes) to even turn the wheels.
If running a roll centre correction kit, standard or less caster, 15's and even a higher rear (positive rake) then the system can cope fine due to much less MT and SAT. More inline with that of the non sport.
The issue is the non sport electric column is designed specifically for cars with smaller tyres, less mechanical trail and self aligning torque. If you run sticky rubber and increased caster the torsion bar and assistance calibration cant cope and you'll have 'laggy' steering that needs to have the torsion bar twisted a lot (all the way sometimes) to even turn the wheels.
If running a roll centre correction kit, standard or less caster, 15's and even a higher rear (positive rake) then the system can cope fine due to much less MT and SAT. More inline with that of the non sport.
I wonder if a Clio 3 197 column could be used in a 182.. obviously a lot different and bulky but could be interesting
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Anyone done surgery to it? Taken the torsion bar out and beefed it up?
I run a correction kit on mine, sticky tyres etc.. also a looped standard 182 rack.. feels pretty good, but can feel a sort of disconnected feeling if I’m throwing it hard into turns… it’s not that bad but different to the HPAS.
I am thinking about doing the pure motorsport castor strut top kit but but don’t want to make things harder on the EPAS if it possibly will, i actually thought it could help with more self centre characteristics that more castor gives.?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This is the mk2 column.
View attachment 1564931
View attachment 1564932
This is the hpas from the 182
View attachment 1564933
This is the total amount that can be twisted, although they are disconnected and would obviously take a lot more force to twist. Under parking situations and heavy load it can twist that much.
Also why you should never run a looped hpas rack. A dci rack or manual quick rack conversion are your best bet, but people do weld them together.
View attachment 1564934
You will 100% benefit from the alternatives above, that disconnect feeling is a lot down to the looped rack.
For the cost it would be better to fit a 197 or more modern powerful epas column.
Its a balance when adjusting caster, yes you will gain more self aligning torque (self centering) but mechanical trail also. The way you can offset this is by having the lower ball joint lower to the ground, with a rcck you are already lower and lowering even more could possibly do more harm to the roll centre and the scrub radius (more positive) unless you add more king pin inclination to balance that out. If you lowered the wishbone mounting points also then you could keep your original scrub radius.
Adjust one thing it changes another... Gives me a headache to say the least [emoji1]
Exactly that, Brt motorsport also do a manual quick rack.That’s really interesting, so I could possibly improve the disconnected feeling by fitting a quick rack and pinion like this … http://www.pure-motorsport.co.uk/clio-2-rs-quick-rack-25-reduction.html
It’s a solid pinion
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ive heard the racks fit but the columns are slightly different.Is there no way to retro fit the epas from the Twingo RS133, being basically a clio underneath id of thought it would be a near direct fit. The rack itself is shorter/quicker than the non sport version also.
Edited.Its a balance when adjusting caster, yes you will gain more self aligning torque (self centering) but mechanical trail also. The way you can offset this is by having the lower ball joint lower to the ground, with a rcck you are already lower and lowering even more could possibly do more harm to the roll centre and the scrub radius (more positive) unless you add more king pin inclination to balance that out. If you lowered the wishbone mounting points also then you could keep your originalscrub radius.Roll centre
Or…..no PAS at all for a track only car. I haven’t missed mine and I binned it years ago.Fairly sure I prefer the feel of HPAS, though I haven't driven the same car on same tyres/suspension/etc back to back.
EPAS makes the car more reliable (one less thing to go wrong), easier to work on, lighter & more powerful.
Wouldn't bother on a road car, but if it's a pure track/race car I'd consider it a no-brainer for the reliability & extra space alone.
is it not a handful when it gets out of shape? maybe I need my Weetabix but I think id struggle to catch it if it got out of shape without PASOr…..no PAS at all for a track only car. I haven’t missed mine and I binned it years ago.
is it not a handful when it gets out of shape? maybe I need my Weetabix but I think id struggle to catch it if it got out of shape without PAS
@incy-spider Is the steering wheel in the same position with the new rack as it was with the original hpas rack? Or did you have to clock the epas coupler?
Yep exactly the same place, and even re zero’d the angle sensor. It’s down to the yaw at what the computer thinks is low steering input
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You may need renault clip software to reset it. Are you sure you didnt spin the wheel when the rack was out?
What happens if you clear the code, and then switch ESP off every time before you drive? im not clued up on the inner workings of the system.Okay so some info.. converting a HPAS rack with the looped method is s**t. Mainly down to the pinion as talked about above, not many people even know it’s a two piece design which causes some horrible feeling steering.
also the right amount of fluid that is acceptable in the rack is an unknown, in my case when I pulled it apart yesterday had quite a lot still in there which could have caused a few stiff issues..
anyway now the best bit, I’ve converted to a short rack from pure 25% reduction, the steering now feels sharp and precise as it used too but… BUT!!!! now I have problems with my ESP because the the steering angle sensor is saying say 5 degrees and the actual amount the wheels turn is a lot more so then that messes with the YAW sensor!! 😔 for now I have disconnected the YAW sensor so I can use it without the ESP cutting in at 10mph when turning, but that obviously has left me with the SERV and ESP lights on which I’m hoping to sort by re flashing the ABS computer with non ESP software but don’t even know if it possible yet..
anyone have a work around?
What happens if you clear the code, and then switch ESP off every time before you drive? im not clued up on the inner workings of the system.
ah ok, yeah it must detect the different from expected wheel speeds due to more lock being dialled in, frustrating but there will be a solution I'm sure!
I’m not sure if it’s wheel speed or the degrees of yaw it’s sensing at what it thinks is a small amount of steering input
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Is there a way you can configure a lock to lock reset in clip?
Id have thought if it was activating the ABS that's going to be due to it sensing a slower than expected speed so thinking you are starting to get lockup. Does it only do it at slow speeds? Id check the live data and make sure the sensors are all reading correctly in a straight line.