Interesting, I will have a look at these Sodemo ones, but that name I associate with a bending over (price I mean, not just because of the way it sounds!!!).
You see I was always thinking the next step would be to run solid lifters and VVT delete with big cams. But frankly solid lifters seem a lot of hassel now and I think I can make the right power without running them.
My current 403's I now believe don't need pistons, the exh cam has less total lift than 402's and only very minor extra duration, there is also a very big jump in the lift on the exh cam when going up 1 cam to 404's. It is the biggest jump by far across the entire range which leads me to belive the 403 is designed to stay on stock pistons as it is valve springs too. 404's again are the first in the range needing stiffer springs (which I have installed alread), so I think that is the cam I should have ran from day 1.
Because of the piston thing I decided to do some sums to work out dynamic compression ratio etc, short of it is not enough overlap on the 403's and the DCR is remaining maybe too high and perhaps not allowing quite enough spark advance to make the power I was expecting.
So pretty sure running 404's will make a nice improvement and of course still easily within the confines of a hyd lifter spec cam, and I 'expect' them to idle fine, maybe raised a bit.
The only thing is maybe I should just go straight to ITB's and run the 405's....?!!! I don't think 405's would idle for s**t on a plenum though! Interesting that Xrally run a maximum of 12.2mm lift on hyd's, at 12.5mm they say you need a solid tappet. - So it rules out 406's which have 12.2mm on the inlet, I don't want to operate on the line.
So 404's or 405's??? TDF were making 240bhp on ITB's with 404's.