It'll be the remap that eliminates those flat spots rather than the RS2 I'm assuming?
Very impressive, mind.
Remap helps in some points, but does very little at the top and and not much at the bottom either, in the midrange if anything a remap on a standard inlet can just about outperform an RS2 for a thousand or so rpm typically, at 5500rpm or so the standard inlet is pretty hard to beat with anything really, RS2 will just get past 150lbft at that point where as standard inlet can get past 160lbft (for a fairly short amount of rpm) which you will find hard to better even on bodies unless they are mega long, but everywhere else its poorly compromised really. So if you look at the peak torque figure in isolation (what a few people on here who I have seen slagging the Rs2 do), then the standard inlet actually looks better, but if you look at it over a few thousand rpm the rs2 (or bodies) wins hands down.
The difference to drive between just a remap and a remap after an rs2 is very noticeable IME
Best non RS2 car I have ever seen on standard cams is this one:
Thats got a fairly wide spread of 2Krpm where it outperforms the RS2, although I suspect it would be more like 1K if the RS2 was fitted to that same engine as that one is so good, and even where it outperforms it, its not by much, but even that engine is nowhere near a match at the top or bottom of the graph and is a dozen bhp down on power compared to the one above with the RS2.
But it does show that there is that point in the middle where the standard inlet works well.