looking better is a matter of opinion, but I hate the 197! IIRC most people voted for the 172/182 over the 197 on looks poll.
Faster - yes. Power to weight ratio is 158 bhp/ton. The 172 cup coming in at 170bhp/ton.
Admittedly the 197 will be more refined, but lets be honest, you don't buy a clio if you want refined.
It was a cold start fix, on cold they can be a real bugger with kangerooing and very poor performance, pulling away you sometimes have hardly any power at all.
I had mine updated ages ago and it makes a massive difference, the OP is getting a new car so it wont matter, but if you have a pre-08 197 you can have the patch installed for free at renault (actis solution number 7103 i think)
Incidentally, you get much better low end torque and a slight improvement in accelleration and about 1mpg improvement.
Can any Mk3 have this patch installed at renault or just the 197?
you talk about power to weight ratios... but then go on about how clios don't make their power very often. fail tbh.
Thats because most people on here have 172/182's.... they vote for their own cars
Now, i've had a 172 Cup, and had my 197 for a year now. There is no difference, the 197 is not slow as you put it. In fact just going by book times the 197 has a quicker 0-62mph time...... Also i out dragged a cup off here, and yes he was trying
http://www.cliosport.net/forum/showthread.php?t=384793
My mates Pug GTi 180 did a 172 cup and I was a passenger and trust me the Clio driver was trying. I was pretty upset by the result to be honest because I bang on about Clio RS's to him all the time. Also by that token my 197 has beat the pug a few times.
A 197 is leaps and bounds ahead in development over 1*2's, and on a motorway will pull away. Introduce corners and point to point a 197 will show why its the better car.
The only 1*2 id have is a Trophy. - Very nice!
dude, i've had Renaultsport clios for the last 5 years a 172 Cup, 182 cup packed and now a 197, i think i know the score.........
Can any Mk3 have this patch installed at renault or just the 197?
The 197 is a vast improvements to the Renault sport range!
Loved the cup, always has a special place in my heart, but i love the 197, the box, the seating position, the less gruff engine. All round better package really! (just wish it was White )
dude, i've had Renaultsport clios for the last 5 years a 172 Cup, 182 cup packed and now a 197, i think i know the score.........
My mates Pug GTi 180 did a 172 cup and I was a passenger and trust me the Clio driver was trying. I was pretty upset by the result to be honest because I bang on about Clio RS's to him all the time. Also by that token my 197 has beat the pug a few times.
A 197 is leaps and bounds ahead in development over 1*2's, and on a motorway will pull away. Introduce corners and point to point a 197 will show why its the better car.
The only 1*2 id have is a Trophy. - Very nice!
you talk about power to weight ratios... but then go on about how clios don't make their power very often. fail tbh.
^^ none of that is important, whats important is tha the OP is happy with his new purchase and I dont blame him, i have a 197 myself and they are great cars. He has bought himself a decent car with more refinement and better build, good solid performance, good specification and he's got a fairly decent price too.
Not everyone buys a car for the reasons you do, if we all wanted power to weight rations at a good price like you suggest, we wouldnt all be in clios and you wouldnt be in a 172 cup. Cars are a personal choice, not a contest.
hhmm another interesting thread about the 197. But i sniggered when i read about the 180gti leaving the 172cup The 180 is not as quick as the 1*2 standard vs standard. Thats a fact. I understand too how people see the 197 as an improvement in CERTAIN areas but to say an improvement in ''every'' respect is a matter of opinions.
i wouldn't mind havin a go in either a 172 or 182 whichever derivative and seeing for myself what is the difference.
Happily give you a test drive in mine if vice versa! Really want to try a 197 out
Check this vid out.
http://www.performancecarmagazine.co.uk/videositem.asp?videoID=10
Looks pretty even here. There are a few more 197 cup vids on this site. Love the noise from the 197, better than the 182 bag of hammers sound!
Exactly, it isn't for everyone. What I do find strange, is that for year people on here were criticising the Civic Type R for relatively numb steering and a relative lack of mid-range. Now those sort of faults aren't important.When I watched it I thought the 182 was braking too much, I would have tried to enter the corners without using the brake and apply the power constant through the corner. I expected the 197 to catch up in the corners as the better brakes would allow later braking. I felt the 182 was pulling away on the straights.
Warren4 thats exactly how I felt when I drove the 197, it felt like a Civic Type R numb steering with little communication compared to the 182. I felt disappointed too as it is by far the best hot hatch on sale at the minute but was not my cupper!
Not criticising fella. We all have different preferences, mine make the 1*2 a better choice for me. Doesn't make it the better car full stop.i know what you mean by the steering feeling numb/light, but as the car gets older they usually do feel heavier as wear and tear kicks in and if u ask me that makes for a more involving drive...
Not criticising fella. We all have different preferences, mine make the 1*2 a better choice for me. Doesn't make it the better car full stop.
Always difficult comparing a car on tired dampers with a brand new one. I don't think the 182 would be ranked as one of the best ever hot hatches if the handling was that bad?I found the low speed steering to be numb and over assisted. It weighted up nicely at speed though, and was very accurate. Threading it down a winding country lane was much more enjoyable than holding onto my 182s barge like steering wheel while it rolls around every corner like a jalopy.
I really don't think the 172/182 are actually that great in handling terms. I used to, but I've changed my mind recently. The steering wheel is too big. The seat is too high. There's lots of body roll, and the engine feels like it's full of rusty chisels when you start heading toward 7000rpm and they do not feel stable at all. Not a recipe for perfection IMO. Some people on here seem to think their 172/182 is the fastest bestest handling car ever made. They are great fun, but they're riddled with faults.
Oh and roffle at seb being told to grow up. The Cliosport f**kwittery is reaching new epic heights that I never thought imaginable TBH.
Always difficult comparing a car on tired dampers with a brand new one. I don't think the 182 would be ranked as one of the best ever hot hatches if the handling was that bad?