Lowering 172 ph2

[vomboy 172]

I have just been looking for some lowering springs, and have found people sell different springs everywhere and i dont quite know what is right and what is wrong.

Is it correct , as standard the 172 sits higher at the back than the front?

(When i look at my car it does look this way when you look at the sideskirts they aren't quite parallel to the ground)

Because one firm is selling springs which lower the car 35mm at the front and 45mm at the rear, which they say then levels the car

and k-tec sell springs at 30mm all round

I just dont want to go too low at the rear, where it will look wrong

Any ideas?

 

[edde]

I have just been looking for some lowering springs, and have found people sell different springs everywhere and i dont quite know what is right and what is wrong.

Is it correct , as standard the 172 sits higher at the back than the front?

(When i look at my car it does look this way when you look at the sideskirts they aren't quite parallel to the ground)

Because one firm is selling springs which lower the car 35mm at the front and 45mm at the rear, which they say then levels the car

Difficult to say it its higher at the back suspension deisn is complex but for handling the front needs to look like its lower.

Go with Eisback (or however you spell them somone will be along in a bit to spell it right) as IMO there rest arn't worth it.

 

[Andy_J]

eibach

 

[tommyboy]

sportlines

 

[izibizi]

Eibach Pro-kit F:15mm R:25mm
will look more flat to the ground