Lowwwwww :)

[Jimbo-Clio]

What a piece lol. he has taken a bashing though feel a little bit sorry for him he reminds me of a 14 yr old chav that called kev's 172 a "tonk" and his brothers sxi was "rapid" and "phater". Maybe james should talk to him he will proberly agree its "well low"

 

[W17GLE]

:sleepy:

 

[nicknick]

I just read 9 pages... fcuks sake

 

[Hoppy]

I just read 9 pages... fcuks sake

yh me too, for f**k all!!
what a waste of my life.

 

[.J.a.m.e.s.]

good

 

[.J.a.m.e.s.]

What a piece lol. he has taken a bashing though feel a little bit sorry for him he reminds me of a 14 yr old chav that called kev's 172 a "tonk" and his brothers sxi was "rapid" and "phater". Maybe james should talk to him he will proberly agree its "well low"

Got his number?

 

[gazbenger]

Not going to be that much heavier tbh James.

But like i said, prove us all wrong. I would like to see it

Hes got my old springs and it does go lower on the front of a 1.6 than 1.2, more than you'd think but not uber low.

 

[gazbenger]

What a piece lol. he has taken a bashing though feel a little bit sorry for him he reminds me of a 14 yr old chav that called kev's 172 a "tonk" and his brothers sxi was "rapid" and "phater". Maybe james should talk to him he will proberly agree its "well low"

VERY inexperienced Cs'er trying to gain Kudos.

 

[Android]

fuckk.
this is still going haha.

Fony !

 

[gazbenger]

Thats how my car was (16" superlegs with 45 profile tyres) when I had James's springs in.

 

[Hazza]

35mm ??

 

[gazbenger]

Yes.

 

[Hazza]

Looks good, but I think people are just laughing @ the fact that James was trying to prove to us that its sitting as low as it does in the pic, when in actual reality, it doesn't.

 

[gazbenger]

Fair enough, I couldnt be bothered to read the 8 pages

 

[Laura]

 

[Jon.L]

mugged off?!

 

[cat171]

I've had enough.