incorrect. narrowband is always faster for CONTROL, ie fuel trim
so unreliable, the AA and RAC keep renault pencil coils onboard their vans.
Poor justification for spending to "upgrade" when there's nothing wrong with wasted spark. You would see no discernable benefit in driving.
i didn't mention the use of wideband for monitoring at all. Monitoring and control are 2 totally different things
might want to check yourself before you start with the sermons
So your saying for control a £50 narrowband sensor is better than a £1000 wideband? whatever.
maybe they keep the coils because so many cars have them? nissan and renault use the same coils and probably others too
I never said there was anything wrong with wasted spark, i said there was advantages to sequential fuel and spark, eg controlling individual cylinders etc
I didn't mention about using the wideband as control, so ner..........
because i would need a £1k wideband to do the job properly!
I think you asked why i needed a wideband, because unless the map wasn't very good, narrowband is fine. my answer is after driving my car around for 18 months and then you find out the map isn't so good, as in going very lean on full throttle on at least 2 sites, i needed to get it sorted at the time as cheaply as possible (before any permanant damage was done), and wideband was the answer, at least i trust my work and it's done properly.
I put here endeth for a reason, because i wanted to just let the problems i had lie (believe me i've had a load more problems with my car than just a map!)