ClioSport.net
Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.
182
have a look over at www.rstuning.co.uk look at "chiptuning" and enter in your car details
Mk2 Ph1 Clio Sport 1.4
His car will be a 1.4 8v though, and there is no chip listed for that
Martin_172
ClioSport Club Member
more gains to be had rempaing a 1.4 than there is from a 172!
dCi 65 + C2 (<Sold)
Crazy good gains from remapping a dci!
Defo want one for my next car.
Defo want one for my next car.
'06 MK3 Clio 1.4L
I have a Clio DCI 80
Performance exhaust, K&N panel filter and a tdi-tuning.co.uk diesel tuning box bringing it to around 110bhp
Further gains could be made by changing turbos, intercoolers etc...
dCi 65 + C2 (<Sold)
I have a Clio DCI 80
Performance exhaust, K&N panel filter and a tdi-tuning.co.uk diesel tuning box bringing it to around 110bhp
Further gains could be made by changing turbos, intercoolers etc...
My dad has a 65, but he isn't the type to go modifying it lol. Still a good drive standard though.
182
mk5 fiesta zetec s
what bhp are 1.6 mk2 ph2 is it 110
Christopher
ClioSport Club Member
Z4M
Zero point.
Christopher
ClioSport Club Member
Z4M
Oh you...
Mk2 Ph1 Clio Sport 1.4
Not necessarily, mine is 8 valve built in 2000, depends on the precise one he has
Correct. 10bhp my hole!
Audi A3
my mate had a 1.4 16v 2000 he never got round to mapping it before he sold it but il admit with a few others it wasnt near a 172 or 182 obviously but it was still damn quick would have liked to have seen it mapped....
Golf GT TDI
because its never going to be a flying machine is it? honestly?
my friend has a 1.4 16v dyna+ 2001
a good holiday somewhere hot with lots of half naked girls sounds a better plan
Yes.
182
it is worth it!
10bhp on a car with very little to start with is going to be noticed lads
its a near enough 10% increase. come on
10bhp on a car with very little to start with is going to be noticed lads
its a near enough 10% increase. come on
because its never going to be a flying machine is it? honestly?
my friend has a 1.4 16v dyna+ 2001
a good holiday somewhere hot with lots of half naked girls sounds a better plan
lol, well yes, naked girls is always going to be better.
However I dissagree on not being worth it.
On Sprint Tracks and local Meets I was able to keep up with the 2.0's A well modded 1.4 16v is about 125 bhp per ton, it can be increased further but you start get spend lots!
From a valve for money/fun point of view it is far cheaper to run a modded 1.4 for 3 fun years rather than unmodded bordem for 2 and a 172 for 1, no?
Golf GT TDI
i guess. how much would it cost to map a 1.4/1.6?
there is always the internet for naked girls
I think there were 2 or 3 different models in this range though, the S and the Si wasn't it, different models in the 'sport' category? and in the 1.4 and 1.6 I think.
I am trying to remember, I bought one new a 2001 1.4 Si 16v and there was a cheaper one than mine but still under the 'sport' range, it was a really good, surprisingly nippy car for the size and handled better than the 182. That is maybe where the 8v/16v difference is coming in.
Last edited:
Why not teh 1.4? They are identical cars, but teh 1.4 is cheaper to buy and run? Also the 1.4 is eaiser to tune imo.
197
1.4 's' is what they are really called. It is a 8 valve. Just sold mine at the weekend.
Italian 3.2 V6
Yes It's slightly cheaper, but I'd pay the little extra for the 1.6 as u would always have that little extra punch... Just a personal opinion as I owned a 2004 1.4 16v before I bought the 172, always wished I'd paid that little extra for 1.6! Tbh I would of thought 1.6 would also have more tunning potential over the 1.4...
M
