Rear engined 106

[DazG]

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Peugeot-106-REAR-ENGINE-2-2-VTEC-modified-show-car_W0QQitemZ150141167820QQihZ005QQcategoryZ9859QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

The work go into looks great, the rear flaired arch is OTT!

 

[Maxx]

looks alright bar the colour and the front bumper

 

[Andy1.2]

Looks horrible but i bet it goes like stink!

 

[DazG]

If they had make it look like a standard GTI that would be cool

Could someone tell me how to do the whole "click me" link thing, I forgot

 

[ollie]

Waste of dollars

 

[Ian_182]

That name again is "Mr plough"

Awful car

ian

 

[Storm_Force]

The exhaust pipes coming out the bumper like that is that legal?

 

[rustybolt]

The exhaust pipes coming out the bumper like that is that legal?

why not, ive seen an exhaust coming out of a front wing!

 

[Josh220]

lol when i first got my clio it came with those fugly wheels. thank god i got shot of them!!!

bet that car shifts though.

as people have already said, not too kean on the front bumper

 

[clio_mad]

I much prefer this!
RWD Saxo Vtec

Proper sleeper and probably goes better than the fillertastic 106.

 

[Beef-Mc]

Prefer the sleepers, much more fun to watch peoples faces

 

[gaz44]

Sleeper with a massive hole in the side?

 

[CabinFever]

Not impressed by the Saxo TBH. 220 bhp 900kgs if im not mistaken the car the engine came from would equal if not better that quarter mile time and weighs more?? Dont get me wrong i can appreciate the work that must have gone into it, but for me its a waste of money under achiever, that drunks will use as a porta potty come weekends if parked in the highstreet!!

 

[Frasers Cup]

And it only does a 14.26 on the quarter mile... Bit of a waste of £ IMO

 

[FlamingMonkey]

14.2 thats a bit s**t, nice work though

 

[tommyboy]

not my cup of tea but good effort

 

[mini-valver]

14.2 is a bit dissapointiing but imagine the potential....

 

[R20 CWH]

10/10 for effort, just looks a bit chav for my liking

 

[Chris n nic]

How can that even be right...14.2 with a rear wheel drive 900kg Type R engine? Ben who used to come on here got a 14.5 in a bog std type r with about 300kgs more and 23bhp less...and less traction!?

And how is it a clever air intake..wouldn't it be more clever to have air flowing directly in to it instead of past it?

Chris