RS Tuning 182 rolling road power graph printout

[jonnyboy]

Dont think I need to go into any more detail than in the other thread, back to back results etc they are what they are here's the printout for you to argue over

 

[BenR]

i dunno, i'd be impressed with that if it were a camshaft swap, but an remap!!!

 

[jonnyboy]

The guy cant do anything fairer than a direct back to back comparison, same day same car no other variables other than the remap and people still dont believe it!

Could it just maybe be possible that its a really s**t hot remap maybe? I dont see any other explanation myself. Drivers reports support the power graph evidence (all done on a brand new rolling road by the way) I'm sure as more people get it done and get other RR results, 1/4 mile times etc RS Tuning will rightly gain more credibility on here. £300 for a remap or 2 grand for your cams swapping for the same results? Easy choice!

 

[bellautos]

Good results if you ask me ,

@Jonnyboy may be next time paul or you got to the RR you can taks some pics of the Dyno its self , Then peeps may belive that it is actualy a brand new Dnyo so the results are correct.

( And that the results are not made from a old ranshackle RR that is out of calibration)

This may stop some of the questions and statements that peeps dont belive it.

 

[fizzy_drink]

It seems to vary from car to car...

PLUS the car tested wasn't std AFAIK - perhaps the remap particularly suits an IK and Exahust?

 

[jonnyboy]

That has been pointed out and a standard 182 is gonna be subjected to the same test on the same rollers

 

[len_beach]

My 172 had an exhaust and a PiperX panel with silicone elbow but that only made +5 bhp, still a cracking gain but sort of disproves the 'suits an exhaust and IK' theory. Though I did gain about 14 lb/ft at 2.5k and I ran 173.5 standard.

 

[BenR]

The guy cant do anything fairer than a direct back to back comparison, same day same car no other variables other than the remap and people still dont believe it!

Could it just maybe be possible that its a really sh*t hot remap maybe? I dont see any other explanation myself. Drivers reports support the power graph evidence (all done on a brand new rolling road by the way) I'm sure as more people get it done and get other RR results, 1/4 mile times etc RS Tuning will rightly gain more credibility on here. £300 for a remap or 2 grand for your cams swapping for the same results? Easy choice!

If you go to the other post, you will see where my point of view is comming from.

I already said i applaud the effort and testing and proof, and that the RR is a good one etc etc etc.

Maybe it is a s**t hot map, but there are plenty of s**t hot mappers out there who have been trying for a long time. And you do have to take into consideration the questions i posted in the other thread, its only natural since these engines like to make power when detting.

Again, not a hater..........but i get grilled all the time, you get used to it.

 

[jonnyboy]

Maybe it is a sh*t hot map, but there are plenty of sh*t hot mappers out there who have been trying for a long time. [/QUOTE]

Which is where this map comes from, its the latest files used on these maps.

My comments werent particularly aimed at you tuners its more an appeal to other people just to take into account that people other than the member tuners can offer good products and services even if they are not part of the club as such

 

[jas1]

Good results if you ask me ,

@Jonnyboy may be next time paul or you got to the RR you can taks some pics of the Dyno its self , Then peeps may belive that it is actualy a brand new Dnyo so the results are correct.

( And that the results are not made from a old ranshackle RR that is out of calibration)

This may stop some of the questions and statements that peeps dont belive it.

take a look at the link, this is where we went for RR sesion, brand new dyno fitted mid april

http://www.theracingline.co.uk/news.php