I know one is a compact and the others are SLR but ive narrowed down these cameras to what i like and can kinda afford.
The sony is a lot cheaper being compact, seems a decent size and photos are nice, and you can get extra lenses on top for wide angle etc...
However im drawn towards plumping up the money for an entry level SLR, simple fact is a like photography, looking at getting into it a lot more as i currently have a Trust 910 powercam which in all fairness rubbish compared to the three im looking at.
Basically i want to know am i worth getting the an entry level SLR over the highish end Compact? The money difference is nearly £150 - £200.
Also is there much difference between the EOS 300 and 350?
Any one got the above cameras that can give me there feedback on them, and if possible some sample pics to see the quality.
Thanks :approve:
The sony is a lot cheaper being compact, seems a decent size and photos are nice, and you can get extra lenses on top for wide angle etc...
However im drawn towards plumping up the money for an entry level SLR, simple fact is a like photography, looking at getting into it a lot more as i currently have a Trust 910 powercam which in all fairness rubbish compared to the three im looking at.
Basically i want to know am i worth getting the an entry level SLR over the highish end Compact? The money difference is nearly £150 - £200.
Also is there much difference between the EOS 300 and 350?
Any one got the above cameras that can give me there feedback on them, and if possible some sample pics to see the quality.
Thanks :approve: