Coupe/Defender V8
It's not even debatable, you'd cream the V6 Ben
It's a car and it moves in a forward motion - what's the problem?
Where does the Vee belong? A showroom is my guess!
It's just not designed for that - it's designed for being a sublime and stunning road car. Something it accomplishes 10 times over the 1*2.
yea mate mines a ph1 172 replica 1.2 i have to admit :rasp:
seriously, gti's and vts's are really good off the line, much better geared 1st 2nd and 3rd, by which time the quarter mile will be over and the 172's will be finding it hard to keep up
before any of your other funny comments i do own a ph1 172 and have previously owned slightly breathed on gti and vts and both have been very quick cars, certainly better than the 172 and others off the line
Fair comment, but they're also quicker through 2nd in my experience, a good launch in a gti/vts through 1st and 2nd and the 172 will be struggling to keep up maybe until 3rdOff the line is a fair comment but a drag race isn't over in 1st gear, so there are other factors. The 172's wouldn't be finding it hard to keep up, albeit there wouldn't be much in it. You make it sound like the GTi's or VTS's would be taking it easy.
I so often question why anyone feels the need to go a split second faster than another car. Lacking something maybe?
These cars also move in a reverse direction. A 'race' in reverse would at least be interesting, and perhaps more fun.
Why does it matter what is faster?
Just shut up and drive!
Fair comment, but they're also quicker through 2nd in my experience, a good launch in a gti/vts through 1st and 2nd and the 172 will be struggling to keep up maybe until 3rd
Ok it would be a bit closer than i made out but even still, if the clio's engines were a little more revy and responsive (not always possible with 2.0's) then they would be awesome on the quarter
My point really being they are more suited to track work once rolling than a quarter mile
IMPO v6's arent that quick because of them being rather lardy, or atleast from what ive witnessed, and i imagine the charged 172 will beat one by a few car lengths
You 2 not familiar with track related activities i take it? :rasp:
A quarter mile is a way of finding out how quick a car accelerates in other words a true reflection of how quick a car is.
Some folk like ragging their car round a track, some like taring up a quarter mile. Its the whole point in modding a engine. If you dont track it theres no point ..
just make sure you dont come up against a supercharged v6.check you tube and watch how fast it is dam quick
That would be to fair then, we like un realistic challenges on here
LOL @ this thread and the Vee owners thinking there cars are something comparible to cars such as a 599 in the looks department!
They did look good five or six years ago but even cars such as the new RS's (Clios not the even better looking Ford) and CTR's are in line (or at the very least very close) in the looks department imo....Get over yoursleves FFS the car has wow factor for it being rare to people that are not in the know but i for one dont get as excited about them as i used to!
Gaz you're such a pathetic wee homo!
Vee owners, i for one, couldn't give a monkeys! We love the car for it's looks and presence, noise and soul. Not the pace, or tunability.
If it was that s**t and didn't have the "wow factor" why can i not drive mine without people's neck snapping and people coming up and asking questions.
It's a special car, end of! It could be 172 pace and i still wouldn't care.
Gets boring, watchin the same old half wits dissing it constantly...So you don't like it...Care?! Naww!
Hook. Line. Sinker.
Awesome.
Hook. Line. Sinker.
Awesome.
Its not a s**t car...I like it but i dont think it commands the same road respect you lot would have us deprieved 1*2 owners believe!
At the end of the day its still a Clio regardless of how 'different' it looks.
Its not a s**t car...I like it but i dont think it commands the same road respect you lot would have us deprieved 1*2 owners believe!
At the end of the day its still a Clio regardless of how 'different' it looks.
yea mate mines a ph1 172 replica 1.2 i have to admit :rasp:
seriously, gti's and vts's are really good off the line, much better geared 1st 2nd and 3rd, by which time the quarter mile will be over and the 172's will be finding it hard to keep up
before any of your other funny comments i do own a ph1 172 and have previously owned slightly breathed on gti and vts and both have been very quick cars, certainly better than the 172 and others off the line
V6 Clio's arent fast
Ive seen standard 172's run better times than standard V6's - a supercharged 172 would blitz a V6. If you supercharge a V6 though the outcome would be different ! ?
Yes but most people think it's a normal clio with a body kitI disagree. You see a 1*2 and the average person wouldn't be able to tell it from a normal Clio.
A woman in my old work said to me one day, Brett you like Clios, I saw a great big wide Clio on the motorway the other day what was it?
She wouldn't bat an eyelid at any other Clio tbh.
wht are 2 completly different cars being compared in a race.
a mid mounted NA v6
a fwd hothatch which is charged
have a race with another hothatch which has been tunned
a mildly tuned meggan
a tuned golf gti or focus st
i know theres a lad in middlesbourgh with a SC type r, sure he'd be up for it.
i think its silly to compare with a vee.
I disagree. You see a 1*2 and the average person wouldn't be able to tell it from a normal Clio.
Agree'd! Moving on?
tuned vs untuned perhaps?