Starting to miss my old 182, and I'm half tempted to sell my 250 and to come back to a Clio and get myself a daily as well.
In terms of performance how does a 172 Cup compare to a 182? I mean I know the differences, but how does say a Cup backed 60mm 182 compare to the 54mm of the 172? Does it make any difference or are they exactly the same?
It'll be stripped out, caged, coilovers, etc. And then it'll be more than likely Turbo'd and fitted with an LSD.
So I'm not fussed on the comforts of the 182 (climate, cruise, etc). Weight of the 172 doesn't matter so much as they'll both be stripped out and I'll run an AC delete kit. It's just really the 54mm vs 60mm and whether there's any other handling differences. Also I seem to recall the gearboxes are slightly different (circlip?), which I'm not sure which would take boost better.
Would potentially be looking at low/mid boost more than likely - Meg Rods and Pistons, or just Meg headgasket, so aiming for around the 260bhp mark.
In terms of performance how does a 172 Cup compare to a 182? I mean I know the differences, but how does say a Cup backed 60mm 182 compare to the 54mm of the 172? Does it make any difference or are they exactly the same?
It'll be stripped out, caged, coilovers, etc. And then it'll be more than likely Turbo'd and fitted with an LSD.
So I'm not fussed on the comforts of the 182 (climate, cruise, etc). Weight of the 172 doesn't matter so much as they'll both be stripped out and I'll run an AC delete kit. It's just really the 54mm vs 60mm and whether there's any other handling differences. Also I seem to recall the gearboxes are slightly different (circlip?), which I'm not sure which would take boost better.
Would potentially be looking at low/mid boost more than likely - Meg Rods and Pistons, or just Meg headgasket, so aiming for around the 260bhp mark.