MarkCup
ClioSport Club Member
Wait until presbyopia sets in chap.
How do people cope with normal watches or print? Or their current phones (without looking a complete d**k with texts showing in 72pt)?
Wait until presbyopia sets in chap.
They buy glasses. Smart phones etc have been a massive bonus for opticians. No one over 40 used mms etc 10yrs ago. Now it's the norm to check emails etc on phones. And it's much smaller print. So people that didn't used to have probs until mid to late 40's have trouble earlier.How do people cope with normal watches or print? Or their current phones (without looking a complete d**k with texts showing in 72pt)?
They buy glasses. Smart phones etc have been a massive bonus for opticians. No one over 40 used mms etc 10yrs ago. Now it's the norm to check emails etc on phones. And it's much smaller print. So people that didn't used to have probs until mid to late 40's have trouble earlier.
It's smaller on the watch.So your point about the 'small' text on the watch is moot; it's no different to what people have to cope with already?
anyone mentioned left-handed use yet? im not left handed but do wear my watch on my right arm so would find this difficult to use.
I hate everything apple so none of this affects me anyway
Im afraid thats your own fault for being a weirdo. Crowns and pushers are generally on the right hand side for a reason.
anyone mentioned left-handed use yet? im not left handed but do wear my watch on my right arm so would find this difficult to use.
I hate everything apple so none of this affects me anyway
I'm the same. Broke my wrist in several places so I have to wear it on the wrong side.Im afraid thats your own fault for being a weirdo. Crowns and pushers are generally on the right hand side for a reason.
The type of people that have that sort of money to hand over for a watch will either be hard core watch enthusiasts or Russian/ Middle-Eastern mill/billionaires. It's not aimed at us mere mortals.$10,000 for a gold apple watch..... Err no
They'll sell loads as above but smart watches are pointless things.
Seeing as it's Apple, no. As that would be naughty.Will there be a w4nk stroke counter?
I thought that. Bar replying, all those functions with the pebble. Haven't used it in months, just sat gathering dust.I can see why we'll all have these in the future.
Why would I want to dig my phone out of my pocket to read and respond to a text or to check an appointment or directions when it's available immediately on my wrist?
Once the technology improves, I'll have one...just not an Apple one as, comparatively, they'll be ridiculously overpriced.
So this is just going to promote further laziness?Why would I want to dig my phone out of my pocket to read and respond to a text or to check an appointment or directions when it's available immediately on my wrist?
I thought that. Bar replying, all those functions with the pebble. Haven't used it in months, just sat gathering dust.
The only thing that they offer over a phone, is not needing to take my phone out of my pocket. Not that an apple phone even fits in the average pocket :wink:.
Not sure I want to live in a world where taking a phone out of a pocket is considered an inconvenience.
They'll be adopted by geeks etc, but unless it offers in pocket sexual favours, it'll never ever replace my inaccurate automatic watches.
I had the Sony one for a short while. Although it has nothing on this it was still pointless.At the minute but we'll all have one someday... comply citizen of Europe. It's not for me either but even I can see points for and against them. It needs to be cheaper for me to splash out for one now though.
I don't agree at all. Something that offers something new has the potential to become essential (like the mobile phone). But this is an accessory. It'll never pull me away from a traditional watch.At the minute but we'll all have one someday... comply citizen of Europe. It's not for me either but even I can see points for and against them. It needs to be cheaper for me to splash out for one now though.
I don't agree at all. Something that offers something new has the potential to become essential (like the mobile phone)
Tablets do offer something that laptops don't. This doesn't. No one has said it won't be a success? Simply that I don't see the point/value having been an early adopter of similar tech. It's a solution to a problem that doesn't exist for me.Agreed, when the iPad was announced everyone was saying that there's no point when you can just use a laptop and they've sold quite a few iPads.